Leica Digilux 2: PC World labtest discovers detachable lens hood...

Discussion in 'Digital Cameras' started by ThomasH, Jun 8, 2004.

  1. ThomasH

    ThomasH Guest

    Aren't you astonished how massive computer (or personal
    computing) magazines suddenly deal with digital cameras??

    I could enlist here a variety of recent "tests" and "reports"
    with a different level of embarrassment to these self proclaimed
    "photography experts," but probably this message about the $1800
    Leica Digilux 2 hits the spot for the "Grand Moron Super Award":

    The June 2004 edition of PC World on page 141 notifies its
    readers that the Digilux 2 has been added to the "Top 100"
    ranklist after it was tested by the PC World lab. PC World
    states:

    "At $1850 the Leica Digilux 2 is one of the most expensive
    cameras we've tested. However it has a unique bounce flash
    and a detachable lens hood."

    End of message. Wooow, a detachable lens hood. Why or why do
    we pay $400-900 for these inferior Canons, Nikons, Olympuses
    or Minoltas, when for mere $1800 we can *also* get the one of
    a kind detachable lens hood, a marvel of technology!

    (sarcasm off, now serious):
    Well, I have send a 3rd protest letter to the editors of both
    PC World and PC Magazine. This time its a divorce time for me.
    I am canceling the subscriptions. They neglect severely computer
    technology and try to become would-like-to-be Photo Magazines
    with computers.

    Of course, as long enough people will accept this crap and keep
    purchase their papers, they will keep printing their photography
    "tests" and rank lists of cameras. "Ease of use Very Good, Battery
    life fair, 88 points." I will rather stick with these old
    fashioned photo magazines. Maybe their writers still know more
    about photography? What do you think, do they? Or will American
    Photographer begin soon to test processors and graphic cards?

    Thomas
     
    ThomasH, Jun 8, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. ThomasH

    Bill Crocker Guest

    Yes, I saw that also. I can't believe someone actually gets paid to write
    such trash!

    Bill Crocker
     
    Bill Crocker, Jun 8, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. ThomasH

    Paul J Gans Guest

    [snip]
    I agree.

    ---- Paul J. Gans
     
    Paul J Gans, Jun 8, 2004
    #3
  4. ThomasH

    Mick Sterbs Guest

    The logic is, well, they connect to computers, we write about computers,
    therefore we will also write about digital cameras.
    But their depth of ignorance on the latter is astounding.
     
    Mick Sterbs, Jun 8, 2004
    #4
  5. ThomasH

    Dev Null Guest

    And, for "Proctology Today" ? ? ?
     
    Dev Null, Jun 11, 2004
    #5
  6. ThomasH

    ThomasH Guest

    Now, the July edition claims the following: (page 175)

    "Though it costs $1850, Leica's Digilux 2 has a fixed lens. However,
    the lens does have rings for focus and aperture adjustments."

    How can you top these revelations! :)

    They also misquote Steve Sander's conclusions about newest
    DSLR's EOS300D / Digital Rebel versus D70 (see page 91).
    Of course, Steve gives the (later arrival) D70 a clean
    preference over the Rebel, because Nikon packed it with
    advanced features as opposed to Canon, who stripped the
    Rebel of many functions to keep their EOS-10D afloat.

    Ah well, all the talking for nothing...

    Do not forget, Leica's lens has a ring for focus and for aperture,
    astonishing! Settle for nothing less than that ! :))

    Thomas
     
    ThomasH, Jun 15, 2004
    #6
  7. ThomasH

    ThomasH Guest

    And what is your opinion about Photo Techniques (phototechmag.com)?

    Thomas
     
    ThomasH, Jun 16, 2004
    #7
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.