Lumix FX-9 v Canon A620

Discussion in 'Panasonic Lumix' started by Mark, Feb 9, 2006.

  1. Mark

    Mark Guest

    Hi ,

    Any thoughts on this contest would be appreciated. Obviously the FX-9 is a
    bit down on the Mpixels but its up on the LCD both in size and pixels.

    Mark, Feb 9, 2006
    1. Advertisements

  2. Am Thu, 09 Feb 2006 19:52:51 GMT schrieb Mark:
    I don't think those two cameras are comparable. The A620 is much larger
    than the FX-9, so better try to compare two cameras of the same class
    (size) if you want a fair contest (A620 vs. LZ-5 or IXUS750 vs. FX-9).

    Carsten Heinrich, Feb 9, 2006
    1. Advertisements

  3. Mark

    Mark Guest


    But size is not so much of an issue, its the quality and performance that
    are more important. Being used to film SLRs it was never a size issue.
    Mark, Feb 10, 2006
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.