Lumix FZ50 vs. Nikon D80

Discussion in 'Panasonic Lumix' started by Rob Martin, Nov 18, 2006.

  1. Rob Martin

    Rob Martin Guest

    Could any of the experts eyes here really pick the difference in an
    8x10" color print from a Lumix FZ50 and Nikon D80? If so, what might
    those differences be, and how acute?

    Let's assume a Nikkor 18-200mm VR lens versus the Lumix IS lens, but
    only within their overlapping focal lengths. And also disregard any
    features not common to both. IOW I am interested only in the relative
    print quality under identical camera and lens settings.

    I am a semi-pro going overseas and hoping to downsize for the
    occasion.

    Thank you for any advice.

    Rob Martin
     
    Rob Martin, Nov 18, 2006
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Rob Martin

    J. Clarke Guest

    I don't have the Nikon or the FZ50, but I do have a 30D and an FZ7 and can
    venture some opinions based on my experience with those that might
    be relevant.

    Whether there will be a noticeable difference depends on the
    subject matter and the lighting. At low ISOs, with the subject at a
    reasonable distance from the camera and with no subject movement they
    should give pretty close to the same result. At equivalent settings as
    you increase the ISO the FZ will be showing more noise--whether it will be
    noticeable depends on the subject--the 50 is supposed to be much better
    than the FZ7 and the FZ30 but there should still be a noticeable
    difference with low-contrast subjects and subjects with a lot of detail.
    According to the DPreview test the timings on the FZ50 are in the same
    ballpark as for the FZ7, with some on the 50 being a little longer. I've
    missed shots due to the lag between full press and shoot on the FZ7 that
    I'd have gotten with the 30D--the same should be true on the FZ50 vs the
    D80. With close subjects you'll get different depth of field with the FZ
    and the Nikon--again whether that's noticeable depends on the subject.
     
    J. Clarke, Nov 19, 2006
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. At ISO100, probably not.
    At ISO800, most definitely.

    The big sensor on the Nikon gives you a much cleaner picture at high
    ISOs; the flip side of that is that it requires a bigger body/lens.

    -dms
     
    Daniel Silevitch, Nov 19, 2006
    #3
  4. Rob Martin

    Cgiorgio Guest

    The FZ-50 performance really is not that bad when you shoot in RAW mode and
    do the postprocessing on a PC. Drawbacks are that the files (raw + .jpg)
    occupy roughly 20 MB for each picture and it takes about 4 seconds until you
    are ready to take the next shot. Still it would be a lot less weight to
    carry a FZ-50 and a high capacity "image tank" then a DSLR and assorted
    lenses.
     
    Cgiorgio, Nov 19, 2006
    #4
  5. Rob Martin

    Pete D Guest

    The point here really is that you wouldn't want to take the photo with the
    FZ50 in the first place, the handling is bloody aweful, I would rather poke
    my eyes out than have to use that EVF..
     
    Pete D, Nov 19, 2006
    #5
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.