More Panasonic P&S perfection

Discussion in 'Panasonic Lumix' started by agro D-Mac, Nov 14, 2007.

  1. agro D-Mac

    Peter Irwin Guest

    Not too hard really. My longer bellows has an extension of
    290mm. With a 32mm B&L Micro Tessar, that will get you
    around 8 times magnification or a field of view of 3mm x 4.5mm.

    Peter.
     
    Peter Irwin, Nov 15, 2007
    #61
    1. Advertisements

  2. agro D-Mac

    Marty Fremen Guest

    Better than mine then, they only go to 190mm. I use my old 50mm enlarger
    lens as a macro lens after someone pointed out that unlike normal camera
    lenses they're computed specifically for close distance work (plus it has a
    manual aperture - I don't have any auto linkage).
     
    Marty Fremen, Nov 15, 2007
    #62
    1. Advertisements

  3. Atheist Chaplain, Nov 15, 2007
    #63
  4. Another member just pointed out to me, if you had me killfiled like you
    said you did how did you know I reciprocated.

    I hope for your sake when we go to court the judge doesn't ask you to
    spell anything.
     
    The Vintage Monk, Nov 16, 2007
    #64
  5. agro D-Mac

    Douglas Guest

    She's hardly inocent Monkey. Before you arrived on the scene (in this ID
    at any rate) *"SHE"* posted links in aus.photo to a picture lifted from
    my wife's web site (just the way here numb nutted side kick does). It had
    neatly pasted over a picture of a sail boat, two men engaged in oral sex.

    Hardly the behaviour of an inocent bystander. But hey... Why let facts
    get in the way of your story?

    http://www.annika1980.com/silverberg_commits_fraud.htm and you can read
    all about this inocent bystander who so rightly deserves the description
    of "Cyber Slut".

    Douglas
     
    Douglas, Nov 16, 2007
    #65
  6. Still innocent (with 2 n's) to me Fuckwit.
    She posted a link, oh no hang her from the nearest tree.
    I girl posted a picture on my facebook of people having sex on the
    beach, I am hardly gonna call her a cyber slut for that.

    One minute you accuse the innocent one of creating the image and now she
    just posted a link.

    You taught me well
    And you rightly deserve the description of fuckwit.
     
    The Vintage Monk, Nov 16, 2007
    #66
  7. agro D-Mac

    gerrit Guest

    Douggie AKA:
    He has also told us he owns a D20.

    Only idiots buy DSLRs? :)

    Gerrit
     
    gerrit, Nov 16, 2007
    #67
  8. agro D-Mac

    Pete D Guest

    And the 5D of course, what an idiot.
     
    Pete D, Nov 16, 2007
    #68
  9. agro D-Mac

    Douglas Guest

    Oh but wait here's more idiotic purchasing going on right now... I've
    decided to get out of Canon gear entirely. I pre-ordered Nikons. I'll
    miss the 5D but I'm sure the D3 will be every bit as good and have some
    decent advantages over the Canons. The brief (10 shot) play I had was an
    eye opener.

    I also use a Fujifilm s5 for most work at weddings but recognize that the
    Panasonic FZ50 is capable of capturing images when the DSLRs simply bomb
    out. That's why I regard them so highly.

    Douglas
     
    Douglas, Nov 16, 2007
    #69
  10. agro D-Mac

    Sosumi Guest


    Exactly; how else would I now how crappy it is?
     
    Sosumi, Nov 16, 2007
    #70
  11. agro D-Mac

    Pete D Guest

    Cool, they and your three penises should have a great time.
     
    Pete D, Nov 16, 2007
    #71
  12. agro D-Mac

    Annika1980 Guest

    Annika1980, Nov 16, 2007
    #72
  13. agro D-Mac

    Annika1980 Guest


    A sail boat? Another lie.
    http://www.pbase.com/helens/image/89020757
     
    Annika1980, Nov 16, 2007
    #73
  14. agro D-Mac

    Annika1980 Guest

    Annika1980, Nov 16, 2007
    #74
  15. agro D-Mac

    Noons Guest

    ah well:
    http://members.iinet.net.au/~nsouto/photos/John/Red.jpg
    for some true reds and about to be washed out skies!
    ;-)
    then again, it's film: it's got correct colours, without
    the need for filtering or PS adjustments...
     
    Noons, Nov 16, 2007
    #75
  16. agro D-Mac

    John Navas Guest

    NO image has "correct" colors -- ALL images are only rough
    approximations of reality.
     
    John Navas, Nov 17, 2007
    #76
  17. agro D-Mac

    John Navas Guest

    p.s. That's true of the human eye as well,
    not to mention vision perception.
     
    John Navas, Nov 17, 2007
    #77
  18. agro D-Mac

    Douglas Guest

    Curious you mention that John... There is a discussion on aus.photo about
    colours and density. It's nice to hear someone else mention colours are
    "seen" differently by different people.

    Douglas
     
    Douglas, Nov 17, 2007
    #78
  19. Well, just consider the different forms of color-blindness. I firmly believe
    it's not a black-and-white issue (no pun intended) but that it's a graduated
    scale and virtually everyone has some sort of 'mild' color vision deficiancy
    or as you put it everyone sees colors a little differently.

    On top of that you have social conditioning from e.g. news papers and
    magazines, where color prints have been oversatured for decades (they look
    and sell better than those faded photos, don't they?) that people became
    used to exaggerated colors and think they are "normal".

    jue
     
    Jürgen Exner, Nov 17, 2007
    #79
  20. agro D-Mac

    Noons Guest

    you mean the colours associated with
    the voices are not reality?
    awwwww...........
    :-(



    <g,d&r>
     
    Noons, Nov 17, 2007
    #80
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.