NASA tests - can i really really trust 'em?

http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_nasa.htm

not sure you didn't read it but a good smile worth a couple of days living
(retrieved from ru.photo)

--

ian green
Xeto : photo & graphic project
http://xeto.front.ru
..

 

Thank you, Mr. Green, that made my day.


Patrick

 

Interesting report. I think the writer took some creative licence
though, I mean with the f/1.0 lens, the AF on the EOS-1n does tend to
hunt as there is just too much light, so I doubt those photos are good
enough to reveal the tickery of the magiscians performance, as the
report suggests... it was probably written to distract upper management
from the lawsuit.

The rest of course seems accurate.

Cheers,
Alan

 

do i really have to say urban myth?

 

Deathwalker wrote:

do I really need to always include a humor impairment warning?

 

When humour is used it is common practice to use a or ;p

 

Hmmm. If a jibe, then I'd agree, but for 'dry-decode-if-you-can' humor
I'd let it set... see how many suckers it catches. ;-)

Cheers,
Alan.

 

but best unbelievable stories are always told with serious face....

--

ian green
Xeto : photo & graphic project
http://xeto.front.ru
..

 

How about f64 tungsten suckers.
f64 tungsten = dim bulb.