NASA tests - can i really really trust 'em?

Discussion in '35mm Cameras' started by ian green, Feb 27, 2004.

  1. ian green

    ian green Guest

    ian green, Feb 27, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  2. ian green

    Patrick L. Guest

    Patrick L., Feb 27, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  3. ian green

    Alan Browne Guest

    Interesting report. I think the writer took some creative licence
    though, I mean with the f/1.0 lens, the AF on the EOS-1n does tend to
    hunt as there is just too much light, so I doubt those photos are good
    enough to reveal the tickery of the magiscians performance, as the
    report suggests... it was probably written to distract upper management
    from the lawsuit.

    The rest of course seems accurate.

    Alan Browne, Feb 27, 2004
  4. ian green

    Deathwalker Guest

    do i really have to say urban myth?
    Deathwalker, Feb 28, 2004
  5. ian green

    Alan Browne Guest

    Deathwalker wrote:

    do I really need to always include a humor impairment warning?
    Alan Browne, Feb 28, 2004
  6. ian green

    Deathwalker Guest

    When humour is used it is common practice to use a ;) :) or ;p
    Deathwalker, Feb 29, 2004
  7. ian green

    Alan Browne Guest

    Hmmm. If a jibe, then I'd agree, but for 'dry-decode-if-you-can' humor
    I'd let it set... see how many suckers it catches. ;-)

    Alan Browne, Feb 29, 2004
  8. ian green

    ian green Guest

    but best unbelievable stories are always told with serious face....


    ian green
    Xeto : photo & graphic project
    ian green, Feb 29, 2004
  9. How about f64 tungsten suckers.
    f64 tungsten = dim bulb.
    Charlie Dilks, Mar 1, 2004
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.