Neil Barker Retract Your Lie

Discussion in 'UK Photography' started by Phil Kyle, Nov 11, 2006.

  1. Phil Kyle

    Phil Kyle Guest

    In <[email protected]> pathalogical liar Neil Barker
    accused a new and innocent poster, Lyrics Lover, of being a "sock". As
    part of his "evidence" he accused the poster of the following:

    "3) You only post to d.l. and x-post to where your retard 'friends' do."


    It is impossible to X-post in demon.local using Individual.net, which is
    the NSP Lyrics Lover uses.

    Neil Barker must retract his lie. The clock is ticking.

    --
    Phil Kyle™

    T
    h i
    i s
    s l
    f i l
    S o n o
    i u e n
    g r s g
     
    Phil Kyle, Nov 11, 2006
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Phil Kyle

    DVH Guest

    The crack lawyers have been notified and are chafing at the bit.
     
    DVH, Nov 11, 2006
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Phil Kyle

    ah Guest

    I demand a Fatwa!
     
    ah, Nov 12, 2006
    #3
  4. This is true. Each message to a different group must be sent individually.
    This is also true. I append some messages once posted in similar
    circumstances so Barker cannot claim he is ignorant of the dilemma in which
    he has placed himself:

    [BEGIN HELPFUL MESSAGES FOR BARKER'S PERUSAL]

    You are hereby served notice that you have 48 hours from the date of this
    posting to apologise and retract that comment, before I then take further
    action against you for defamation with your ISP and then further if I feel
    it to be necessary.
    Do not underestimate my willingness to do this. I take your libellous remark
    extremely seriously. (Neil Barker)
    ===========================================================
    "Well, he'd better not go too quiet, as if I have not seen a full retraction
    and apology in these two newsgroups by Sunday evening then his ISP will be
    receiving a complain on Monday morning. If he does not then respond to his
    ISP, telling him to apologise to me,
    then his ISP will then receive a solicitor's letter to forward on to him.
    It's his choice." - Neil Barker
    ========================================
    Whilst that miscreant continues to post to dl in an unacceptable way (and
    ukfdm fail to support dl in its clear intention to protect its standards)
    I'm afraid that, if anything, it will get worse.. (Keith)
    =======================================================
    Unfortunately another person (also migrating from ukfdm) has posted a
    defamatory remark, accusing a dler of 'forging'.
    This is untenable. The person concerned really must reconsider their
    position.. (Keith)
    ====================================================
    Don't underestimate Neil, he WILL go to court if necessary. - Steve Barlow
    =========================================
    In which circumstance a certain person should consider their position.
    Seppuku is no longer an acceptable option.. - Keith
    ========================================
    *How* it happened is not important. It may be considered mitigation. But the
    deed - posting an accusation of forgery [in this case Barker posted an
    accusation of crossposting] - requires recognising as defamatory and a
    suitable retraction posted to usenet. And the clock is ticking... - (Keith)
    ======================================
    I have been publicly and falsely accused of something I have not done.
    Something which is defamatory to my character. Thus, a full public
    retraction is necessary. If it is not forthcoming, I *will* take it
    further. It's his choice. (Neil Barker)
    =====================================

    [/END OF HELPFUL MESSAGES]

    It is now up to you, Barker. The clock is ticking.
     
    Theobold Watcher, Nov 13, 2006
    #4
  5. Phil Kyle

    Phil Kyle Guest

    They obviously need some more crack.

    --
    Phil Kyle™

    T
    h i
    i s
    s l
    f i l
    S o n o
    i u e n
    g r s g
     
    Phil Kyle, Nov 15, 2006
    #5
  6. Phil Kyle

    Phil Kyle Guest

    If you mean Fatwanker, then Barker qualifies (although he's so fat he
    probably hasn't seen his willy for 20 years).

    --
    Phil Kyle™

    T
    h i
    i s
    s l
    f i l
    S o n o
    i u e n
    g r s g
     
    Phil Kyle, Nov 15, 2006
    #6
  7. Phil Kyle

    Phil Kyle Guest


    Well, these quotes may make Barker look silly. And he's never done that
    before.

    --
    Phil Kyle™

    T
    h i
    i s
    s l
    f i l
    S o n o
    i u e n
    g r s g
     
    Phil Kyle, Nov 15, 2006
    #7
  8. Phil Kyle

    Mitch Crane Guest

    And less chafing.
     
    Mitch Crane, Nov 16, 2006
    #8
  9. Phil Kyle

    Phil Kyle Guest

    And more thongs.

    --
    Phil Kyle™

    T
    h i
    i s
    s l
    f i l
    S o n o
    i u e n
    g r s g
     
    Phil Kyle, Nov 16, 2006
    #9
  10. Phil Kyle

    Mitch Crane Guest

    Yeth pleathe. No more lyricth lover pothtth.
     
    Mitch Crane, Nov 16, 2006
    #10
  11. Phil Kyle

    Phil Kyle Guest

    Thacrelidge!

    --
    Phil Kyle™

    T
    h i
    i s
    s l
    f i l
    S o n o
    i u e n
    g r s g
     
    Phil Kyle, Nov 17, 2006
    #11
  12. Phil Kyle

    ah Guest

    ROLO!
     
    ah, Feb 9, 2007
    #12
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.