Nikkor Af 35-105 F3.5/4.5 vs. Af 28-105 F3.5/4.5 Macro

Discussion in '35mm Cameras' started by itemyar, Sep 21, 2005.

  1. itemyar

    itemyar Guest

    Anyone here own either of these lenses, or do you have an opinion?

    The 35-105 is a bit smaller in size, and since this is for a second camera
    (casual, take anywhere kind of camera), that might be a selling point, but
    on the other hand, the 28-105 has the wider focal length and Macro
    capabilities. 'Course there's the difference in price too!

    Thoughts, recommendations??

    Thanks all!
     
    itemyar, Sep 21, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. itemyar

    columbotrek Guest

    I own the 28-105 AFD. It is decent and its on my N80 a lot. A bit slow
    for indoor available light but thats what the 50mm f/1.4 is for. When I
    first got it, I was really happy with it and still am. But after using
    the 28-70 f/2.8 AFS and the 80-200 AFD my expectations got boosted which
    is why I now consider it more a compromise lens. The Macro setting gets
    you down to 1:2 but to focus in the macro range, you need to be in focal
    lenghts greater than 50mm. There is a lock ring enforcing those
    limitations. BTW the simular sounding 28-100 AFG is not the same lens.
     
    columbotrek, Sep 21, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.