Nikon D3 and Nikon D2xs compared

Discussion in 'Nikon' started by Dr. Georg N.Nyman, Mar 17, 2008.

  1. Hello to everyone,
    For those who are interested - I just have put my most recent review online,
    which is my personal comparison of these two cameras.
    You can find it here:

    I hope you have some good time reading it - if you wish, email me questions

    Georg N.Nyman
    Dr. Georg N.Nyman, Mar 17, 2008
    1. Advertisements

  2. Dr. Georg N.Nyman

    JimKramer Guest

    HTTP Error 404

    Bad Link?
    JimKramer, Mar 17, 2008
    1. Advertisements

  3. Dr. Georg N.Nyman

    Steven Green Guest

    Steven Green, Mar 17, 2008
  4. Dr. Georg N.Nyman

    Paul Furman Guest

    "The main base setting of speed is an ISO 200 equivalent and if you need
    a one-stop lower sensitivity for a certain reason (too much light??),
    then you can do so, but there is no visible advantage of ISO 100 over 200."

    Is there any disadvantage to pushing the ISO down like that?

    "It is pretty consistent what I observed - the D3 shots are brighter
    than the D2 shots. I need to point out that they are not overexposed raw
    files, I would say, these files reveal the fact, that the D3 has got a
    larger and wider tonal range - a wider range of exposure which can be
    used for imaging."

    Does that account for that much exposure difference though? I'd like to
    see the numbers for that.
    Paul Furman, Mar 17, 2008
  5. Dr. Georg N.Nyman

    C J Campbell Guest

    Yes. The manual says you will lose some contrast.
    C J Campbell, Mar 22, 2008
  6. Dr. Georg N.Nyman

    RichA Guest

    That is an awesome test series you've done.
    RichA, Mar 23, 2008
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.