Nikon D3x buyers beware - D700x already in prototype

Discussion in 'Nikon' started by RichA, Dec 10, 2008.

  1. RichA

    RichA Guest

    Potential Nikon D3x buyers beware - D700x is already in prototype! Compared
    to the D3x, it's a no-brainer as to which is best. D700x has the same
    sensor,
    same AF, marginally less VF coverage, slightly slower shooting rate (4.5
    fps
    /6 fps in DX mode), smaller/lighter body (till you add the D700's
    battpack),
    same lowlight performance (like the D3x, iq is no good above 1600 ISO - if
    you need high speed, D3/D700 is the way to go), slightly slower bootup
    time,
    almost the same lens compatibility - and an extra $4000+ in your pocket.

    D3x can never sell in this economic climate, so I recommend Nikon roll out
    the D700x now. That will probably mean the end of Canon DSLRs forever.
    Their
    shit latest version of the 5D was inferior to the D700, let alone the
    D700x.
    I am sick of seeing all those cream lenses at sporting events. Nikon always
    had them beat lens-wise. The last good Canon camera was the A-1, and even
    it wasn't reliable if the air got damp. Nikon, OTOH, have produced a superb
    range of cameras, what is it now - all winners or best-in-class: S3, SP, F,
    F2, F2A, F2AS, F2B, FTN, FM, F3, FG, FA, F4, F5, F6 (kinda), D3, D700.
     
    RichA, Dec 10, 2008
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. RichA

    SMS Guest

    You knew this would happen. Nikon got blindsided by Canon's 5D Mark II
    which is far superior to the the D700. Alas, not sure if the D700x will
    help Nikon all that much at the high end at this point in time. What
    Nikon really needs to compete at the high end is a whole new line of
    lenses that can match the high quality of Canon's BWLs (big white
    lenses). Until Nikon comes out with a fluorite lens, they'll be unable
    to make much headway at the high end.
     
    SMS, Dec 10, 2008
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. RichA

    Pete D Guest

    I do wonder why the f**k he would actually care, I could seriously not give
    a rats arse......
     
    Pete D, Dec 10, 2008
    #3
  4. RichA

    Mark Thomas Guest

    Yes, the endless debates over cameras that don't exist yet and where
    exactly they fit into the respective ranges and do they fill in a gap
    and have they pushed the density envelope too far... absolutely riveting
    stuff.

    I only get interested once a camera gets a thorough workout (by those
    brave/stupid enough to be early adopters), sticks its head up above (eg
    D3) or below (eg M8) the pack and then gets the publicity it deserves...

    Discussing vaporware is a little fruitless, although any day now I
    believe SiliconFilm will finally be releasing the answer to all of our
    problems:
    http://www.dcviews.com/_siliconfilm/10.htm


    (Sorry.. bad joke. I hope no-one here actually invested in that..)
     
    Mark Thomas, Dec 10, 2008
    #4
  5. RichA

    Guest Guest

    it hasn't happened yet. it's a *rumour*.
    in some ways yes, in other ways no.
    we've been through this before. both companies make excellent lenses
    and flourite is not a requirement.
     
    Guest, Dec 10, 2008
    #5
  6. RichA

    Eric Stevens Guest

    .... unless you are making bread for Superman.



    Eric Stevens
     
    Eric Stevens, Dec 10, 2008
    #6
  7. RichA

    ad607 Guest

    Now don't you bring facts into a debate started by Richard Anderson, all his
    "insider info" comes from $10/hour Toronto Henry's salesdroids.

    Camera sales people are either failed photographers, or wannabees
     
    ad607, Dec 10, 2008
    #7
  8. RichA

    Rich Guest

    Sorry, but some freak hijacked my name. I did not post that Nikon
    rumour, but it is interesting.
    Also, I believe the D3x will sell because some people need the
    resolution and they won't wait for any D700x.
     
    Rich, Dec 10, 2008
    #8
  9. RichA

    John Smith Guest

    Come on: "Some people need the resolution"???? 99.9999% of the prints made
    in the world are 11x14 and under. Just ask ANY film lab anywhere.

    Read Ken Rockwell's astute article on the D3x.

    Perhaps 1/100 of 1% of us ever print larger than 16x20. Who the **** needs
    25mp for anything 11x14 and under???

    I'm staying with my D3 and saving $5,000
     
    John Smith, Dec 10, 2008
    #9
  10. RichA

    Guest Guest

    you mean the guy who fabricates a lot of what he writes? that's not
    what i'd call astute.
     
    Guest, Dec 10, 2008
    #10
  11. RichA

    Chris H Guest

    Absolutely... Who would buy a D3X when a entry level hasselblad is a
    mere 11K GBP (15K USD?)

    The D3X is aimed at the top DSLR users and the bottom end MF and studio
    users. MF camera are 25-40MP

    A D3x has got to be a better bet for people who use both MF and
    DSLR/35mm
     
    Chris H, Dec 10, 2008
    #11
  12. RichA

    tony cooper Guest

    Should that bother anyone buying a camera from a camera store?

    A failed photographer is someone who tried to make a business out of
    photography and failed. Lack of knowledge of camera equipment and
    photographic techniques would be far down on the list of reasons for
    failure. Lack of people skills and lack of business skills are the
    reasons that most would-be professional photographers can't make a go
    of it as a business. Lack of capital would the next item on the list.

    You have basically two groups of camera sales people: big box sales
    clerks and camera store sales clerks. Rarely will you find a big box
    camera sales clerk that is more than minimally knowledgeable. If that.
    Usually, you will find dedicated camera store clerks to be
    knowledgeable and helpful. There are exceptions in both groups, of
    course, but that's the way it usually works.

    The people who have trouble with camera store sales clerks are the
    amateurs who come into the store thinking that they know more than the
    clerk and are more intent on proving this than they are in being
    informed. The clerks usually figure this out early in the
    conversation and stop being helpful. They know they aren't going to
    convince this know-it-all that (brand) lenses are good, and they just
    lay back and let the customer run the show. Then the customer struts
    out thinking "That guy isn't qualified to sell cameras".

    I suspect, based on the threads in these photography groups, that many
    of the regular posters are in this category.

    And, no, I am not - nor have ever been - a camera store clerk.
     
    tony cooper, Dec 10, 2008
    #12
  13. RichA

    Jurgen Guest

    Only an idiot picks a fight with a stranger. Plenty of evidence to
    suggest ex army and ex boxers actually retaliate when self serving
    idiots think they can go around solving their problems violently. You can't!
     
    Jurgen, Dec 11, 2008
    #13
  14. RichA

    ASAAR Guest

    You've been trolled by the ng's sock puppet who chooses to remain
    anonymous, i.e., a stranger.
     
    ASAAR, Dec 11, 2008
    #14
  15. RichA

    tony cooper Guest

    Your comments prove my point. The person who truly knows photography
    and photographic equipment - and know what they want - doesn't get
    into discussions with camera store clerks. They walk in, tell the
    clerk what they want to buy, pay for it, and leave. No customer has
    to "sit there" and listen to anything.

    The fact that you've engaged in argumentive discussions with camera
    store clerks indicates that you went in looking for an argument. No
    clerk is going to engage in an argument with a buyer that specifies
    exactly what he wants unless the buyer provides the opening. When you
    say you "explain" why the "ignorant clerk" is "ignorant", you are
    admitting that you are looking for an argument. You only tried to
    explain because you wanted the argument.

    What you wanted was an audience; someone who had to listen to you
    blather on about your expertise. Your audience is trapped because
    they were paid to stand behind the counter. You, on the other hand,
    could have said "Ring up the (item)" and been out of there.

    My guess is that the reaction of the camera store clerks when you walk
    in the store in your area is "Here comes the blowhard again".
     
    tony cooper, Dec 11, 2008
    #15
  16. Of course, tony, you are right, but you are also "conversing" with the
    pest. The nym-shifting coward polluting the group with his manifesto of
    P+S malarky.

    Not that there's anyting wrong with that....

    :)
     
    John McWilliams, Dec 11, 2008
    #16
  17. RichA

    tony cooper Guest

    I didn't realize that. As I've said before, I tend to read posts for
    content and not pay attention to who writes the posts. I do
    automatically skip over any post with "virtual-" or "Dear
    Resident-Troll" in it, though.

    There's evidence of very real mental instability in those posts.
     
    tony cooper, Dec 11, 2008
    #17
  18. RichA

    ASAAR Guest

    There are easier, cheaper ways to find the lice on your mutt.
     
    ASAAR, Dec 11, 2008
    #18
  19. However, it is amusing....
    barely.

    I'd call it more the anti-Canon Missioner vs. the Cowardly Pest.....

    Mileage variable....
     
    John McWilliams, Dec 11, 2008
    #19
  20. RichA

    SMS Guest

    Did you send him any money to help him continue his fiction career?
     
    SMS, Dec 11, 2008
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.