Nikon D40X

Discussion in 'Nikon' started by À嵿Çõ, Mar 5, 2007.

  1. À嵿Çõ

    À嵿Çõ Guest

    À嵿Çõ, Mar 5, 2007
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Yet, oddly enough the D40x isn't mentioned anywhere else. Full of
    himself Ken, is the only one to claim that it was announced today (March
    5, 2007)

    Even Thom Hogan hasn't predicted that!
     
    Not Disclosed, Mar 5, 2007
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. À嵿Çõ

    Guest Guest

    despite it being 'announced,' kenny doesn't seem to know a whole lot
    about it, such as the fps, the maximum iso, the sync speed, and most
    importantly, the price. and his claim about the laws of physics
    requiring the iso to be lower because the number of pixels is higher is
    ludicrous.

    as of right now, the d40x is just a rumour.
     
    Guest, Mar 5, 2007
    #3
  4. À嵿Çõ

    Paul Furman Guest

    The exact opposite, all other things equal!
    I guess it could make sense putting the same sensor in all their
    cameras, creating a bigger market and dropping the price of the most
    expensive component in that way. But it's still got to be quite a bit
    more expensive.
     
    Paul Furman, Mar 5, 2007
    #4
  5. À嵿Çõ

    C J Campbell Guest

    C J Campbell, Mar 6, 2007
    #5
  6. À嵿Çõ

    Jeff H Guest

    Not a rumor any longer. It's even on the Nikon website.
     
    Jeff H, Mar 6, 2007
    #6
  7. À嵿Çõ

    Filmless

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, "Full of himself Ken" scoops again - sorry wanabes

    You guys don't get it. Ken got the scoop, he provides a much better service than you bashers (OK, prove me wrong and post your better-than-Ken site), and he's on his game.

    Why is it that every time someone pours themself into something and delivers one of the best service sites around you second-guessers have to try to knock them? If you have something productive to add, have at it, or better yet put out a better site (good luck). Go ahead, take your shots at Ken, he doesn't care because he doesn't have anything to prove. Unlike you.

    And no, I never met Ken. I just appreciate what he does for general photography. And why is it the whiners always have the "not disclosed" name or moniker?
     
    Last edited: Mar 7, 2007
    Filmless, Mar 7, 2007
    #7
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.