Nikon D7000 vs. Canon Eos 60D

I currently own an Olympus E-Volt 500, which has served me well when my
skills were more limited than they are now. Wanting to move up to a
prosumer level camera, naturally I would like to stick with Olympus
because I already own the lenses and their 4/3 system is not compatible
with third party lens manufacturers. The Olympus E-30, or whatever
iteration in the next generation would be the one.

The only problem is that Olympus is apparently going out of the DSLR
cameras, hinging their star to the EVF-IL types. They have produced
only one new DSLR camera in two years, and that one is to replace their
professional E-3 with the E-5. Since it is evident that Olympus is not
going to support their DSLR lines with new models, it is apparently time
to switch. I'm currently looking at the cameras in the topic line and
would like to know pros and cons. I've handled both of them and both
are far heavier than my Olympus and a bit more cumbersome to use. But
they are what they are, and it's evident I'll have to get used to one of
them. So, any reasons why I should purchase one over the other? I
realize the initial investment, which includes replacing all my lenses
is going to be rather steep.

 

As a Canon user of many years I feel Canon have let themselves down a
little with the prosumer xxD series since the 40D. The 40D was and
still is a far superior build quality than the 50/60D and I would still
rather own a 40D than a 50/60D. In fact, even though I own two 5D
Mk2s, I still have a 40D and would never swap it for a 60D. I have
always believed that you get more bang for your buck with Canon cameras
than the equivalent Nikon models but on this occasion, if my only
choice was between a Canon 60D and a Nikon D7000, I would rather own a
D7000. However, this would only be if I did not already have a suite
of lenses for Canon, of course.

MC

 

: I currently own an Olympus E-Volt 500, which has served me well when my
: skills were more limited than they are now. Wanting to move up to a
: prosumer level camera, naturally I would like to stick with Olympus
: because I already own the lenses and their 4/3 system is not compatible
: with third party lens manufacturers. The Olympus E-30, or whatever
: iteration in the next generation would be the one.
:
: The only problem is that Olympus is apparently going out of the DSLR
: cameras, hinging their star to the EVF-IL types. They have produced
: only one new DSLR camera in two years, and that one is to replace their
: professional E-3 with the E-5. Since it is evident that Olympus is not
: going to support their DSLR lines with new models, it is apparently time
: to switch. I'm currently looking at the cameras in the topic line and
: would like to know pros and cons. I've handled both of them and both
: are far heavier than my Olympus and a bit more cumbersome to use. But
: they are what they are, and it's evident I'll have to get used to one of
: them. So, any reasons why I should purchase one over the other? I
: realize the initial investment, which includes replacing all my lenses
: is going to be rather steep.

Don't buy a 60D. It doesn't have user-settable autofocus micro-adjustment. And
if my experience with Canon equipment is any guide, you probably WILL need
that feature.

For about the same money, buy a 50D (if you can find one).

Bob

 

Handling may be quite important to you - the feel and weight of the
cameras, how easy or otherwise you find the menus. Perhaps even how well
you can operate the camera whilst wearing gloves. I compared bodies when
I first bought, and preferred the Nikon to the Canon, and now I'm sticking
with range that as I have a few lenses.

If I were in your situation, I would consider going to the smaller and
lighter EVF-based micro 4/3 cameras, where you could use your existing
lenses. I would certainly consider the lighter end of the Nikon range -
perhaps the D5100. You don't want to be leaving the camera at home
because it's too heavy or bulky!

Cheers,
David

 

Recent news from Olympus suggests that, as a result of the outcry that
greeted the company's suggestion that no more E-System DSLRs would be
developed, Olympus has changed its mind. The company is now expected
to continue with the development of future E-X and E-XX models.
However there will be no more E-XXX models, because Olympus believes
that the market for these has largely been satisfied with the
introduction of PEN mirrorless cameras.

So if you have a substantial investment in the excellent Zuiko Digital
lenses there will be an upgrade path with the Olympus brand.

This is Olympus' official policy. If I can find a link to a press
release I will post it.

 

David:

Thank you for your advice, however, I will never use one of those EVF
cameras. I want a DSLR with a mirror box. Olympus is hitching their
star to them, as they likely believe that they're the best invention
since canned beer. I had the opportunity to try one on a recent trip to
the Amazon. The man in the zodiac next to me had an Olympus PEN EP-1.
He let me handle it, and I was truly amazed at the weight of the camera.
It weighed less than my wife's compact, and in fact, came close to the
weight of some of the smaller point-and-shoot cameras. It had state of
the art features, including full HD. I put my 70-300 lens on it, just
for kicks, and the lens was 50% heavier than the camera.

However, when I attempted to use the viewfinder, good luck. Couldn't
see a thing. That, simply put, substantiated my conjectures regarding
those EVF-IL cameras. They're no better, IMHO, than the cheap
point-and-shoot cameras with those views. They're not DSLR's and never
will be, no matter how technically sophisticated they make them.

I posted this because I recognize that I will likely have to switch
manufacturers and after handling both cameras, wasn't too impressed with
the ease of changing functions with either. But, they are what they
are, and if I want to move up in a DSLR, those are the two I'm
considering right now. I just wanted some opinions on the quality of
one as compared to the other, as I really haven't had the opportunity to
use them under actual circumstances, beyond the camera store.

 

That's good to know. All the people I spoke to, including sales
representatives were very non-committal and close-mouthed regarding this
issue. In fact, one source in Olympus that I had an exchange of e-mails
with seemed to indicate that they were banking on the PEN cameras as
opposed to the DSLR type. None, however, would say what the official
policy was with respect to the DSLR line. I've seen nothing published
to support what you say, so if you have a link to some official source,
I'd appreciate it. I get the Olympus newsletters periodically, and I've
seen nothing from them regarding this issue there. I'll look again;
maybe it was buried somewhere that I missed. As I said, I'd rather
stick with Olympus, and since I've already waited two years, I'll wait
another one if they're going to come out with the next iteration to the
E-30.

 

Everything has changed within the last few weeks. Two months ago,
Olympus suggested that there would be no new DSLRs. But the outcry
from Olympus owners, enthusiasts and the dealer network forced the
company to reconsider.

A recent notice to Olympus dealers in Europe that states the E-X and
E-XX models will continue but there will be no more E-XXX models. The
E-620 will be the last E-XXX model and that has not been manufactured
for some months now. Unfortunately I am not allowed to republish that
notice.

That was the situation a few weeks ago. It has changed.

I don't think there was one.

My guess is that the company's statement about DSLRs being
discontinued was intended only to elicit a response from Olympus
stakeholders around the world. The outcry convinced Olympus that it
would be worth carrying on with E-X and E-XX product lines but not the
E-XXX whose market had almost vanished with the introduction of the
PEN Micro Four Thirds system.

I have seen this information published online but cannot recall where.
I cannot publish anything from Olympus but I suggest you search for it
online. Sites such as photorumors.com and photographybay.com are a
good place to look, plus there is of course 43rumors.com.

Newsletters tend to avoid such issues! ;-)

You may have a long wait, because Olympus has so far been unable to
source a sensor with more than 12 MP.

 

We know the E-X series will continue, because Olympus has already
released the E-5. However, as I indicated previously, I can't get a
straight answer out of anyone in Olympus, and even personnel in camera
stores don't have a clue.

I accept that you can't republish the notice as to Olympus' future
marketing plans, however, given what you said about the outcry( myself
included ) from Olympus owners, it makes no sense to NOT tell these
owners, like myself, that Olympus is NOT abandoning them. Absent such
notice, I'm purchasing another system.

As to you assertion that Olympus is not going to compete in the entry
level DSLR business with the E-XXX line, the 620 was one good camera,
and if updated, could have been a hefty competitor to the Nikon and
Canon entries. I considered purchasing a 620, but backed off, figuring
that I'd step up to the E-30's next iteration.

If such is the case, then they should let the world know. It makes no
sense to keep this a secret. My opinion.

There had to be. Someone made a decision to cease development on DSLR's
and concentrate on the PEN EVF line.

You may in fact be correct in your conjecture. And the conclusions
about discontinuing the E-XXX line make sense if your conjecture is
correct. The E-XXX line was an entry level line. Any current owner of
an Olympus is NOT going to purchase another entry level camera, but will
likely step up. Hence, the outcry from Olympus owners would surely be
concentrated in demand of the prosumer and pro lines. So your
conjecture makes sense.

But I've noticed that Olympus doesn't seem to be too swift in making
marketing decisions. Basing their decision on the outcry of current
Olympus owners and discontinuing the the entry level line, is akin to
Nikon receiving feedback from Nikon owners, looking to step up and
deciding to eliminate the 3100, since nobody lobbied for that. IMHO, I
believe that Olympus made another serious error, if wht you say is true,
by eliminating the entry level line. You increase market share by
getting new customers, which your entry level cameras are designed to
do. You don't increase market share by simply satisfying your current
customers. But that's Olympus' problem. I think they're finding out
that the point-and-shoot crowd are NOT going to spend the bucks for the
PEN cameras( witness their latest iteration in that line ) at a
significant reduced price. Even the people who shoot with a compact are
not going to step up to that.

Thanks. I'll take a look.

Well, you have a point there. I didn't consider resolution. But for my
purposes 12 megapixels is adequate. But I do suppose that Olympus will
want to upgrade that if they are going to compete in that market.