Odd used Nikon lens prices

Discussion in 'Nikon' started by RichA, Jan 22, 2008.

  1. RichA

    RichA Guest

    This was at a local store.
    Newish 20mm AF. $400. Old manual model, $700.00. 180mm ED AF model,
    composite body, $500, old manual focus unit $795.00. Do the old
    manual focus units have some "aura" or are they better in some way?
     
    RichA, Jan 22, 2008
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Well, a 180mm/F4 would certainly be much cheaper than a 180mm/F1.8 (given
    similar quality). Of course you didn't tell _which_ lenses you are talking
    about, so we can't guess if that's a possible explanation.

    jue
     
    Jürgen Exner, Jan 22, 2008
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Each MF version has a better feel when focusing manually. I'm told
    that there are a people who also prefer the metal construction
    of the AI-s lenses; you wouldn't know anyone like that, would you :)?

    Still, those prices for the MF versions are wildly optimistic. B&H
    still lists both new 20mm f/2.8 AI-s and new 180mm f/2.8 AI-s lenses
    at $509 and $729 respectively. I doubt they sell very many. On
    eBay, the manual focus lenses consistently sell for less than their
    AF counterparts.

    The 20mm f/2.8 AI-s has the same optical formula as the current 20mm
    f/2.8D. While some people prefer the older Nikon MF 20mm f/3.5 or
    even f/4, even in pristine condition the older lenses tend to sell for
    less than the f/2.8.

    The manual focus 180mm f/2.8 is more of a mixed case. The AI-s
    has a different optical formula which, at least in theory, results
    in better T-numbers and slightly less flare. It's also not an IF
    design. Unlike the AF version, focal length doesn't change with
    focal distance, but it's slightly less convenient to use, especially
    when using filters.

    The first AF 180mm had an ugly shiny black barrel and an awful
    manual focusing ringlet; its value in the used market has
    suffered accordingly.
     
    Michael Benveniste, Jan 22, 2008
    #3
  4. Some of these older lenses have a signature character about them that has
    been lost with some of the modern lenses that produce perfect and clinically
    sterile images. This is why a lot of older lenses are aggressively sought
    after. This is why many Canon shooters by old Nikkors and now with the
    introduction of the D3 you can expect a very sharp spike in the AI lens
    arena.





    Rita
     
    Rita Berkowitz, Jan 22, 2008
    #4
  5. RichA

    Alvaro Guest

    Old MF AI(s)lenses are, in my opinion, the best lens-line ever made by
    Nikon. All glass and metal, an yes, I prefer metal than plasticy modern
    brands, even when some of the new ones have been optically improved. In
    terms of construction quelity, I think there is no comparison between
    those lenses made from the last 70's till now, denominated as AI or AI-s
    in the last series. That is the reason why MF lenses are usally much
    more expensive than AF ones with similar focal distance and max.
    aperture when bought as brand new.
    On the other hand, used MF AI(s)lenses are priced lower than actual AF
    only because nowadays there is a larger demand on new AF ones because
    the AF lenses can be mounted with all their functions on the newest slr
    digital cameras (AF, automatic light metering, etc), but not based on
    their construction and operation quality. Just try to focus manually one
    and the other and make up your choice. Technology goes on growing, not
    always producing better products, but always reducing production costs.
     
    Alvaro, Jan 30, 2008
    #5
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.