Olympus: The ugly reality

Despite dollops of noise filtering inherent in the JPEGs (set to
normal, you can turn it off) and despite the "tests" of various
sources, a 4 year old Nikon still bests it.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1022&message=25956891

 

And that D70 pic doesn't look a little soft to you??? I can see it an I
don't have a very critical eye. Or do you just see what you want to
see...brand name.

Rich

 

Soft? No. In fact it seems to have more detail than the Olympus image
which is interesting, considering it's 6 megapixel versus the
Olympus's 10.

 

So you trust this test to be accurate do you? Oh the shock...Oh the
horror......

Email replies remove REMOVE
Powered by Agent 4.2 Mail/News
http://www.forteinc.com/main/homepage.php

 

The test was straightforward, clear.

 

Of course it was.

Email replies remove REMOVE
Powered by Agent 4.2 Mail/News
http://www.forteinc.com/main/homepage.php

 

People tend to question things that go against what they want to
believe, not matter how bullet-proof the example. Nearly ever test of
Olympus's 10 meg cameras says the same thing: Lower per pixel
sharpness than the competition.

 

Nobody gives a **** about these so called tests, a camera is a tool
for a job. If it does the job for the owner then job done. You act
like a little schoolboy announcing worthless shit on here.


Email replies remove REMOVE
Powered by Agent 4.2 Mail/News
http://www.forteinc.com/main/homepage.php

 

Bingo! Which is WHY Canon has dominated the pro ranks for the last 10
years and now Nikon will reclaim a good portion, not Olympus.