Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ30 or Fuji FinePix S9000?

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ30 or Fuji FinePix S9000

After checking reviews on the web I've narrowed it down to these two. Any
opinions for or against?



"What I would like is a camera that:
a) robust enough to stand up to spending a few days trekking in sometimes
very wet/humid conditions
b) can take reasonably "wide" landscape pics, street scenes etc
c) decent low light shots, sans flash preferably - without reverting to a
tripod.
d) anti-shake would probably be a good thing.....I guess
e) open to suggestions for things I may have not considered"

 

Steve wrote:
> Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ30 or Fuji FinePix S9000
>
> After checking reviews on the web I've narrowed it down to these two. Any
> opinions for or against?
>
>
>
> "What I would like is a camera that:
> a) robust enough to stand up to spending a few days trekking in sometimes
> very wet/humid conditions
> b) can take reasonably "wide" landscape pics, street scenes etc
> c) decent low light shots, sans flash preferably - without reverting to a
> tripod.
> d) anti-shake would probably be a good thing.....I guess
> e) open to suggestions for things I may have not considered"
>
>
Both very nice cameras. I have the earlier FZ20 and it's a honey. The
Leica lens swayed me but battery life is a consideration I never took
into account. My time over again and I'd still go for the Panasonic.

--
Douglas...

 

Just hold the S9000 and even do IR photos with it.
One thing for sure ... its a fine camera. Low high iso noise , solid feel ,
quite sharp lens.

It is owned by a friend of mine who use a FZ-20 before.

=bob=

"Steve" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ30 or Fuji FinePix S9000
>
> After checking reviews on the web I've narrowed it down to these two. Any
> opinions for or against?
>
>
>
> "What I would like is a camera that:
> a) robust enough to stand up to spending a few days trekking in sometimes
> very wet/humid conditions
> b) can take reasonably "wide" landscape pics, street scenes etc
> c) decent low light shots, sans flash preferably - without reverting to a
> tripod.
> d) anti-shake would probably be a good thing.....I guess
> e) open to suggestions for things I may have not considered"
>

 

A few images of the camera uploaded by my friend.
http://widzz.multiply.com/photos/album/9