pano1-original

Discussion in '35mm Cameras' started by Dudley Hanks, Jan 7, 2009.

  1. Dudley Hanks

    Dudley Hanks Guest

    Dudley Hanks, Jan 7, 2009
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Dudley Hanks

    Mark Thomas Guest

    Overall, the image has a slight lean to the left. In other words, the
    left side of the street is a tiny bit lower than the right. For an
    unsighted alignment, you did well in that regard.

    There is a slight bend upwards in the middle, because your camera was
    pointing down too much as you noted earlier.. It's pretty important to
    keep the camera level (in all directions) for this type of shot, unless
    you want those bends..

    Unfortunately, every stitch is obvious because of the lousy way Canon's
    software blends the images. The problems with this program are many -
    it doesn't seem to adjust exposure/vignetting issues, nor does it
    (un)distort the images in order to ensure all features match. Decent
    panorama software does both of those.

    I strongly suggest you download Autostitch:
    http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~mbrown/autostitch/autostitch.html
    (download link near top) and give it a shot. The only problems I had
    with Autostitch were:

    - it would sometimes misalign features
    - you cannot intervene/control the program (probably a good feature in
    some ways!)
    - it choked on large panoramas on my system

    Hope that helps..
     
    Mark Thomas, Jan 7, 2009
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Dudley Hanks

    Dudley Hanks Guest

    That helps a lot, Mark, especially the info regarding the lens being down
    too far. I thought I had it fairly straight...

    I'll have to think about this and try to come up with some way to level the
    cam. A weighted string might work when I'm on level ground...

    Take Care,
    Dudley
     
    Dudley Hanks, Jan 7, 2009
    #3
  4. Dudley Hanks

    Rol_Lei Nut Guest

    I've done worse.... :)

    A couple of hints.

    1) Keeping the camera perfectly horizontal helps (in this case a wider
    lens and not tilting the camera slightly down could have made a difference).

    2) I don't know what stitching program you used, but most allow you to
    set various joining points manually (to sort out bad overlaps) and also
    have different levels of blending & color/density functions which can
    be activated or set (would avoid the banding caused by lighter & darker
    frames).

    3) Manual exposure, to keep all frames exposed constantly (not true in
    *all* cases, but often is).

    Good luck & keep it up!
     
    Rol_Lei Nut, Jan 7, 2009
    #4
  5. Dudley Hanks

    Mark Thomas Guest

    Just a quick aside - Given we are probably only talking a couple of
    degrees, getting it level will be a bit of a challenge so perhaps it
    might be better to shoot in portrait mode? You'll end up with a few
    more images to stitch, but it will give you a bit of leeway in regard to
    getting everything in and not having to crop useful stuff off.

    Note that won't help with the 'bending' you get if the camera is
    pointing up or down. However, distortion in panoramas is sort of
    'expected', so it can be quite effective. Tell 'em it's the curvature
    of the earth...

    One last important tip. When shooting these wide panoramas, as with
    shooting with fish-eye lenses - make sure you keep your ears out of the
    shot.
    Sorry. (O:

    Hope the training goes well,

    cheers, mt.
     
    Mark Thomas, Jan 7, 2009
    #5
  6. Dudley Hanks

    Mark Thomas Guest

    Earlier (different thread) he said he used manual exposure for this
    image, so one would presume he left it the same for all shots. I think
    the effect is just mild vignetting from his kit lens - Canon's software
    doesn't even bother trying to correct this, hence my suggestion he move
    to something (anything!) else..
     
    Mark Thomas, Jan 7, 2009
    #6
  7. Dudley Hanks

    Dudley Hanks Guest

    Yep, the exposures were all the same. Since my daughter stitched them
    together using Canon's Photo Stitch (it was her first time using the
    program), no attempt was made to correct deficiencies. I just wanted to see
    how it looked "out of the [software] box.

    I'll have to sit down with my browser and see what I can find for tutorials
    on Canon's software, as well as the progs recommended by Mark, Jeff, and
    others...

    The next one will look better... How much? That remains to be seen... :)

    Take Care,
    Dudley
     
    Dudley Hanks, Jan 7, 2009
    #7
  8. Dudley Hanks

    Jeff R. Guest

    Good first go, Dudley.

    Now you're hooked.

    Since you've been good enough to share, I will take the opportunity to bore
    everyone rigid with some of my holiday snaps:

    These panos are all hand-held, and assembled in PS, manually.
    I do not suggest for a second that they are *perfect* (even "very good").
    Most have joins that can be spotted - some quite disgracefully so.

    They are all composed of about 5-7 images, usually taken at about "normal"
    (50mm/35 equiv) f.l.

    Exposure was auto - not manual (he shamefully admits) with adjustments done
    pp.

    Every effort has been made to render the scenes faithfully - i.e. as an
    accurate rendition of the actual scene as viewed. No made-up bits and no
    cloned or copied bits.

    Yes - I know they are over-sharpened and show blown highlights - so sue me.
    I like 'em.

    *WARNING*
    Some file sizes are pretty big.
    I've included smaller versions, all with file size and pixel size indicated.

    Feel free to comment, but remember that these are holiday snaps, not
    competition entries. :)

    Trip to Armidale (northern NSW) - nearly two years ago:

    http://www.mendosus.com/armidale/nth-of-armid-pano.jpg
    4653 pix - 569kb

    smaller version:
    http://www.mendosus.com/armidale/nth-of-armid-pano-sml.jpg
    1634 pix - 92kb

    ============================

    http://www.mendosus.com/armidale/nth-of-armid-pano-2.jpg
    3887 pix - 458kb
    (with some unforgivably bad stitches!)

    smaller version:
    http://www.mendosus.com/armidale/nth-of-armid-pano-2-sml.jpg
    1408 pix - 75kb

    =============================

    http://www.mendosus.com/armidale/nth-of-armid-pano-3-huge.jpg
    5574 pix - 720kb
    (with a badly doubled stitch - what was I thinking? - and some genuine ghost
    trees - not stitching faults, just foggy)

    smaller version:
    http://www.mendosus.com/armidale/nth-of-armid-pano-3-sml.jpg
    1408 pix - 80kb

    =============================

    http://www.mendosus.com/armidale/raspberry-lookout-pano.jpg
    4008 pix - 612kb

    smaller version:
    http://www.mendosus.com/armidale/raspberry-lookout-pano-sml.jpg
    1408 pix - 88kb

    key to the above image (not a pano!):
    http://www.mendosus.com/armidale/raspberry-lookout-legend.jpg
    195kb

    ================================

    Not a pano, but a rather pretty illustration of single vanishing point
    perspective:
    http://www.mendosus.com/armidale/vanishing-point.jpg
    1208 pix - 134kb
    I felt I was driving into a textbook illustration of single vanishing point
    perspective, and couldn't resist the photo. I'd have had to find a straight
    railway line to get a better example!
    ================================

    Ben Lomond (Tassie)
    http://www.mendosus.com/photography/benlomond-panorama-large.jpg
    4392 pix - 755kb

    smaller version:
    http://www.mendosus.com/photography/benlomond-panorama.jpg
    2196 pix - 234kb

    =================================

    Geez - I love this country.
     
    Jeff R., Jan 8, 2009
    #8
  9. Dudley Hanks

    Mark Thomas Guest

    Do ya think? (O:
    I also noticed some of them are a bit foggy - did you clean your lens
    lately? (Sorry, I'm having a 'flippant' day..)

    Thanks for posting these, they are very good, and do a fine job of
    capturing the 'look' of the real Oz.

    I really like the first and last, and your perspective shot reminds me
    of an old SI submission of mine, (like you, any lame excuse to post
    images!):
    http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/86568468

    I'd post more except for extreme laziness - plus I'm re-organising and
    moving my site to a new (cheaper!) provider so it's offline briefly.
     
    Mark Thomas, Jan 8, 2009
    #9
  10. Dudley Hanks

    Paul Furman Guest

    I'll second the AutoStitch recommendation. Just select the photos & push
    a button. Amazing.

    --
    Paul Furman
    www.edgehill.net
    www.baynatives.com

    all google groups messages filtered due to spam
     
    Paul Furman, Jan 8, 2009
    #10
  11. Dudley Hanks

    Jeff R. Guest

    At that time of the day, I'm usually well in the land of nod, so the
    appearance of early morning fog was really something to me. Some of those
    valleys around Armidale are *really* pretty when filled with wet cotton
    wool.
    Thx - although only one aspect, to be sure.
    Hehe
    You cheated!
    I took mine from eye height - no squatting!

    Its a difficult-to-resist tableau, yes?

    Well, I may have to move mine when the inventor of the internet shuts it
    down, but we'll see I guess.
    :)
     
    Jeff R., Jan 8, 2009
    #11
  12. Dudley Hanks

    Dudley Hanks Guest


    Sure thing, Alan.
    http://www.photography.dudley-hanks.com/Light-And-Sight/pano1-1.jpg
    http://www.photography.dudley-hanks.com/Light-And-Sight/pano1-2.jpg
    http://www.photography.dudley-hanks.com/Light-And-Sight/pano1-3.jpg
    http://www.photography.dudley-hanks.com/Light-And-Sight/pano1-4.jpg
    http://www.photography.dudley-hanks.com/Light-And-Sight/pano1-5.jpg
    http://www.photography.dudley-hanks.com/Light-And-Sight/pano1-6.jpg
    http://www.photography.dudley-hanks.com/Light-And-Sight/pano1-7.jpg


    And, if anyone is interested in seeing how Adobe Elements and Canon Photo
    Stitch stack up against each other (no attempt to fix defects in either
    pic), here's a couple of links:

    Stitched with Adobe Elements:
    http://www.photography.dudley-hanks.com/Light-And-Sight/pano1-adobe.jpg

    Stitched with Canon Photo Stitch:
    http://www.photography.dudley-hanks.com/Light-And-Sight/pano1-original.jpg

    Take Care,
    Dudley
     
    Dudley Hanks, Jan 8, 2009
    #12
  13. Dudley Hanks

    Dudley Hanks Guest


    That clinches it! AutoStitch it is for my next pano.

    Thanks, Paul, I need all the automation I can get...

    Take Care,
    Dudley
     
    Dudley Hanks, Jan 8, 2009
    #13
  14. Dudley Hanks

    Mark Thomas Guest

    Has anyone else had a go at downloading these? I'm not getting the
    pano1-adobe.jpg example, but more importantly I'm getting corrupted
    areas in pano1-3 and pano1-6. Just wondering if it is me or my
    connection..? The rest seem fine. Reloading the bad images just gives
    me the same problems - the lower parts of the images seem to be tangled
    with others..

    I was going to run them through Autostitch, Hugin and PTGUI, all set to
    defaults, for some comparisons.
     
    Mark Thomas, Jan 8, 2009
    #14
  15. Dudley Hanks

    Jeff R. Guest

    I get the same faults, Mark.

    Dudley?
     
    Jeff R., Jan 8, 2009
    #15
  16. Dudley Hanks

    Dudley Hanks Guest

    Hmmm, not sure what happened there.

    I've re-uploaded panos 3 and 6, and I've reconverted the Adobe version /
    re-uploaded it.

    Let me know if that makes a difference.

    Sorry for the inconvenience...

    Take Care,
    Dudley
     
    Dudley Hanks, Jan 8, 2009
    #16
  17. Dudley Hanks

    Mark Thomas Guest

    Me either, but I'm still only getting 1 of them - the adobe one seems to
    have worked, but these:
    http://www.photography.dudley-hanks.com/Light-And-Sight/pano1-3.jpg
    http://www.photography.dudley-hanks.com/Light-And-Sight/pano1-6.jpg
    ...now give me a '404' (file not found). All the others are still there.

    Yes, but only a 33% difference... :O)
    No problemo. I enjoy challenges!
     
    Mark Thomas, Jan 8, 2009
    #17
  18. Dudley Hanks

    Dudley Hanks Guest

    Ooops, my bad. I forgot to convert the file extension to lower case...

    They should be accessible, now.

    Take Care,
    Dudley
     
    Dudley Hanks, Jan 8, 2009
    #18
  19. Dudley Hanks

    Mark Thomas Guest

    Hahah - Damn - I should have thought of that - I get caught on that one
    myself. Isn't unix *wonderful* like that! Downloading now, they look
    better...
     
    Mark Thomas, Jan 8, 2009
    #19
  20. Dudley Hanks

    ^Tems^ Guest

    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.