[PICS] frustration of hummingbirds

Discussion in '35mm Cameras' started by jimkramer, Aug 23, 2008.

  1. jimkramer

    Noons Guest

    Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 30/08/2008 12:24 PM:
    Never said that. Once again: you're quoting the voices
    in your head, dingbat.


    the voices in your head? Yes, they laugh a lot. At you.
    Stomach is all you have in place of a brain, moron.

    And you don't. Which has been proven time and time again.
    "The result is about 1/6,000 s at 1/16 power,
    and 1/10,000 s at 1/32 power.
    That's plenty of stopping ability"

    Just one more time to get it through your
    sick, frozen brain:
    "The result is about 1/6,000 s at 1/16 power,
    and 1/10,000 s at 1/32 power.
    That's plenty of stopping ability"

    How come the wings in your flash shots are
    COMPLETELY blurred, moron? Explanation, please?
    Instead of more moronic out of context snips?

    Actually, it's this:
    "The result is about 1/6,000 s at 1/16 power,
    and 1/10,000 s at 1/32 power.
    That's plenty of stopping ability"

    "plenty" means PLENTY, dickhead.
    Not the blurred wings in your flash shots.

    But let's not allow truth interfere
    with the voices in your head.

    Gee, it does not sound like ANYTHING
    you said!
    Exactly and precisely. It's got nothing to do with
    the simple fact you still have not explained
    why your shots contradict the simple truth
    you keep quoting.


    What it proves is that you are a complete LIAR,
    a buffoon midget with no brains whatsoever
    and demonstrates your complete lack of any basic
    principles, which shows in the FAKES you constantly
    regurgitate.
     
    Noons, Aug 30, 2008
    #41
    1. Advertisements

  2. jimkramer

    jimkramer Guest

    should have been obvious from the beginning.
    -Jim
     
    jimkramer, Aug 30, 2008
    #42
    1. Advertisements

  3. jimkramer

    Annika1980 Guest

    Are you really this fucking thick?

    I'll type this as slowly as I can so maybe you can follow.
    The wings in my hummer shots are blurred because I DID NOT use a flash
    with a short duration like 1/15000, 1/10000 or even 1/6000 of a
    second.

    So why didn't I just manually set it to 1/128 power to get the
    shortest flash duration?
    Because at the distance I was shooting it would have given me a black
    photo since the power output of the flash is reduced.

    That's as simple as I can make it. If you need more help you might
    wanna check Amazon for the latest copy of "Hummingbird Flash
    Photography for Stupid Fuckers."
     
    Annika1980, Aug 30, 2008
    #43
  4. jimkramer

    Noons Guest

    Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 30/08/2008 1:44 PM:
    I couldn't possibly match you.

    The wings in your hummie shhots are COMPLETELY blurred
    because you used photoslop to do so, moron.
    Even if you had used a full blast flash - which you didn't - it
    would still have been enough to make a good outline, although blurred.
    What you got in your FAKEs is a COMPLETELY blurred wing,
    which is IMPOSSIBLE to obtain with a flash, at ANY power.

    Like I said: totally FAKE.
     
    Noons, Aug 30, 2008
    #44
  5. jimkramer

    Noons Guest

    jean wrote,on my timestamp of 30/08/2008 1:51 PM:
    how about you shove your opinion
    where the sun doesn't shine, diddums?
    Might actually match for once the
    quality of your posts.
     
    Noons, Aug 30, 2008
    #45
  6. jimkramer

    Annika1980 Guest

    Bullshit. And I can of course prove it if you are willing to put your
    cash where your big fat mouth is.
     
    Annika1980, Aug 30, 2008
    #46
  7. jimkramer

    Annika1980 Guest

    NUNO SOUTO: HUMMINGBIRD PHOTO EXPERT!

    And just think, only two days ago you said this:
    "If you used the default synch speed of your camera of around 1/200,
    the wings would be nearly frozen solid."

    I guess even a stupid old mutt can be taught something.
     
    Annika1980, Aug 30, 2008
    #47
  8. jimkramer

    Noons Guest

    Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 30/08/2008 2:37 PM:
    of course, the hawker scammer resorts to illegal
    betting. try leaving those tactics to the low-life
    places you frequent, instead of polluting the Usenet
    even more than you already do.

    once more, to make sure it registers:
    Even if you had used a full blast flash - which you didn't - it
    would still have been enough to make a good outline, although blurred.
    What you got in your FAKEs is a COMPLETELY blurred wing,
    which is IMPOSSIBLE to obtain with a flash, at ANY power.
     
    Noons, Aug 30, 2008
    #48
  9. jimkramer

    Noons Guest

    Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 30/08/2008 2:38 PM:
    which they would. That setup is only for those producing
    jim's kind of shot. Not the photoslop FAKE results of yours,
    with totally blurred wings.
    I guess a stupid smelly midget can always be shown
    the mediocrity of his arguments.
     
    Noons, Aug 30, 2008
    #49
  10. jimkramer

    Annika1980 Guest

    Keep spouting those lies, Noons. Maybe somebody will believe you,
    despite the fact that everyone else (those who have posted and the
    links we provided) agrees with what I'm saying. I've offered to post
    the RAW file for any pic you choose, but you run away like the
    chickenshit that you are. I'm done with your stupid, neanderthal ass.
     
    Annika1980, Aug 30, 2008
    #50
  11. ["Followup-To:" header set to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems.]
    Actually, you don't want "high speed flash", that is, a flash
    setting for faster than x-sync. That'll just have the flash
    stutter at a very fast rate, not freezing anything. :-/

    Use a flash (or many flashes) at a low(er) power setting to
    freeze by flashlight.

    -Wolfgang
     
    Wolfgang Weisselberg, Aug 30, 2008
    #51
  12. jimkramer

    Noons Guest

    Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 31/08/2008 1:44 AM:
    NO ONE "agrees" with you except the "voices"
    in your head, moron. Not one of your sock
    puppets has produced ANY evidence other than
    out of context or off-topic quotes of sites
    that if anything reinforce exactly and precisely
    what I said! Don't confuse your wild and idiotic
    claims of what I said with facts, dickhead.

    Here are a few once more, to make sure it registers:
    Even if you had used a full blast flash - which you didn't - it
    would still have been enough to make a good outline, although blurred.
    What you got in your FAKEs is a COMPLETELY blurred wing,
    which is IMPOSSIBLE to obtain with a flash, at ANY power.
     
    Noons, Aug 31, 2008
    #52
  13. jimkramer

    Annika1980 Guest

    Yes, it's possible that I will ignore him (I don't use killfiles since
    they are for dweebs). That way I'll have more time to devote to that
    other fuckwit, McWilliams.

    "FU SET! FU SET!"
     
    Annika1980, Aug 31, 2008
    #53
  14. jimkramer

    ASAAR Guest

    One size fits all descriptions let a lot of people through the
    cracks. Some, but not all may be dweebs. For the other OSFA
    description, take SMS for example. He certainly uses KFs to "avoid
    people vexatious to the spirit", but "wisdom" is hardly the reason
    why he uses them.

    In this, I agree with Annika (ouch!). If he used killfiles he'd
    think of himself as a dweeb. Whether true or not, I take him at his
    word that that's how he'd feel. Maybe it would be better said that
    if he used killfiles he wouldn't respect himself in the morning. :)
     
    ASAAR, Aug 31, 2008
    #54
  15. jimkramer

    Noons Guest

    John McWilliams wrote,on my timestamp of 1/09/2008 4:31 AM:

    c'mon! you KNOW who are the trolls, scammers and cross-posters,
    don't you? do you think they'll EVER change?
     
    Noons, Sep 1, 2008
    #55
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.