Portraits with Non-DSLR digital camera

Discussion in 'UK Photography' started by Wes, May 16, 2005.

  1. Wes

    Wes Guest

    Hi. I want to buy a Non-DSLR digital camera that is capable of shooting
    good portraits of people. Can you suggest some models for me to check
    into? Here is an example of the type of portraits I like:

    Thanks in advance for help. I'm new to digital cameras.


    Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
    More than 120,000 groups
    Unlimited download
    http://www.usenetzone.com to open account
    Wes, May 16, 2005
    1. Advertisements

  2. Wes

    Sheldon Guest

    This may hurt, but that ain't the best portrait I've ever seen. I'd
    consider that a snapshot. Just about any digital camera would do.

    If you want portraits like these (just did a quick Google search) you're
    probably going to want to up the ante a bit.

    Sheldon, May 16, 2005
    1. Advertisements

  3. Wes

    Frank ess Guest

    I like that (Kevin Thom) Lara photo, but I don't think it is all that
    great, either; or maybe he lost her nose on purpose.

    I think the OP is looking for something that will make relatively
    close-up pictures with recognizable characteristics of the people
    whose representations he produces, not necessarily rising to the
    definition of "portrait" as is conventionally and conveniently used.
    Presumptuous, I know.

    Here are a few from three cameras. Presumptuous again, to call the
    album "Portrait", bu a good deal handier than "Pictures of peoples'
    faces that may show a little of who they are in fewer than a thousand
    Frank ess, May 16, 2005
  4. Wes

    Paul Furman Guest

    Is that a piercing *inside* her nose???! Maybe a reason to lose the tip
    Paul Furman, May 16, 2005
  5. Wes

    Craig Flory Guest

    Hi Wes; There is an old saying among professional photographers "it
    is not the camera , it's the photographer". I have seen some great photos
    done with a pin-hole camera or an instamatic. If you learn composition,
    lighting, and other dynamics ... as well as Photoshop, Photoshop Elements or
    another good program, the camera will be less imporatant. One thing to
    remember about the difference between point & shoot & SLR style ..... point
    & shoot cameras have paralax problems. That means that you view through a
    viewfinder & not through the lens. So what you see is not what get. Things
    are not where you saw them in the viewfinder. So if you do buy a point &
    shoot, make sure it has a lot of megapixels. You will need to back up and
    not get too close because of paralax. If you do you can then crop in
    tighter. Besides that, go for a camera with a fair amount of optical zoom.
    Get one that has a tripod socket on the bottom so you can put it on a
    tripod. I hope these things help. Craig Flory
    Craig Flory, May 16, 2005
  6. Wes

    Trev Guest

    At least 3 MP and with a zoom that reaches 105 to 120 (35mm equivalent) will
    do, the rest is up to you. What feels best Ect. For serious control being
    able to select Aperture priority and maybe the use of off camera flash might
    be more important. Or even does it look expensive if you charging for your
    Trev, May 16, 2005
  7. Randall Ainsworth, May 16, 2005
  8. Wes

    Diane Wilson Guest

    Yeah, she has two piercings in her nose, but it's still flawed

    Diane Wilson, May 16, 2005
  9. Wes

    Diane Wilson Guest

    For indoor portraits, off-camera flash is just about essential.
    Sometimes you can get by with just a bounce, along with *something*
    to fill shadows (reflector, maybe one that's built in to the

    Indoors or outdoors, for portraits, lighting is more important
    than the camera. Outdoors, you have to learn to read the light,
    and learn to shoot with the light you've got. Indoors, you
    have to create the lighting you want, which is harder, but will
    give you tremendous range and flexibility. The camera has to
    have the right flash sync connections to trigger your lighting
    gear, and it needs a good lens to record the quality that you

    I have to agree with Sheldon; that's a snapshot, not a portrait.
    Before picking a camera, try looking at a book on portrait
    lighting, decide how far you want to go with it and what your
    budget can support, then pick lighting and camera equipment
    as a group. I like this book, because it shows a wide
    variety of portraits by a number of photographers, and shows
    how the lighting was set up:


    Diane Wilson, May 16, 2005
  10. Wes

    Mulperi Guest

    Mulperi, May 16, 2005
  11. Wes

    Ron Hunter Guest

    I have NEVER seen a P&S camera that doesn't have an LCD that shows the
    sensor output. If you use a tripod (and for portraits, you should),
    then it is ok to use the LCD for framing the picture, in fact, it is the
    best way. For handheld shots, use the viewfinder, even with the paralax
    issue, because you NEED the inertia of that heavy thing on your neck!
    Ron Hunter, May 16, 2005
  12. Only through their viewfinders, not with their LCD screens.
    Roger Whitehead, May 16, 2005
  13. Roger Whitehead, May 16, 2005
  14. If it has a fair amount of optical zoom it's likely to have
    EVF rather than a viewfinder so parallax is not an issue.
    David Gilbert, May 16, 2005
  15. Wes

    Microwave Guest

    My film ones don't. :)

    I had to shoot a digital P&S for a magazine insert (one of those annoying things that drops out
    by the bucketload when you pick up the magazine) a couple weeks back. It had no LCD whatsoever.
    But it was rather "made in China."
    Microwave, May 17, 2005
  16. No, that's a PoS.
    Roger Whitehead, May 17, 2005
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.