PS CC update

Discussion in 'Digital Cameras' started by Savageduck, Jan 16, 2014.

  1. Savageduck

    Sandman Guest

    Given your clown dictionary, I find that very easy to believe.
    Agreed. You seem to be able to express yourself good enough, but for some
    reason you have this pride invested in words and their meanings leading to
    you refusing any and all support for when you're making mistakes.
    You've lost the benefit of a doubt long ago, Tony. There was a time your
    misinformation could have been mere mistakes, but that was long ago. You
    now make them all the time regularly, so the obvious conclusion is that
    you're fully aware of them being incorrect and you state them anyway.
    Which I did. Peter couldn't have that, though. Me responding to his lies
    and trolling is not the opposite of "let the subject drop", since his
    trolling had nothing to do with the subject - just as this post of yours

    That wasn't the only misinformation from you, here's the other one:

    Tony Cooper
    Re: PS CC update
    01/21/2014 <>

    "You know Jonas. These posts on this subject will just
    prompt him to deluge us with posts about why it's not his

    Since I've done no such thing, this is an incorrect claim, and I no longer
    believe all these incorrect claims are just random mistakes on your part,
    they are part of your trolling act, and as such are willfully wrong. I.e.
    Incorrect. I agree that Savageduck dragged out the subject for quite some
    time for no appearant reason, but I had nothing more to say about it after
    I said that I had missed it - my second post in this thread.
    Another lie. Me exposing your lies is not me "whining".
    Sandman, Jan 22, 2014
    1. Advertisements

  2. Savageduck

    Tony Cooper Guest

    Yes, and my "pride" would require me to write "well enough".

    It would also require me to form a more coherent sentence than the
    above. Why would anyone want support for making mistakes?
    Responding != let drop

    Yet, in fact, you have deluged us with posts on this subject.
    What is truly ironic is that you can deny miscatagorizing factual
    statements as "lies", deny that multiple postings are not a deluge,
    and deny that you have let the subject drop.
    Tony Cooper, Jan 22, 2014
    1. Advertisements

  3. Savageduck

    Savageduck Guest

    Savageduck, Jan 22, 2014
  4. Savageduck

    Tony Cooper Guest

    An instance, here, of a incoherency on my part. It should be "deny
    that you have *not* let the subject drop".
    Tony Cooper, Jan 22, 2014
  5. Savageduck

    Eric Stevens Guest

    Eric Stevens, Jan 22, 2014
  6. Savageduck

    Savageduck Guest

    Savageduck, Jan 22, 2014
  7. Savageduck

    Sandman Guest

    Support from me (and others) about your mistakes. Sorry if I wrote
    Peters lies and trolling != Subject
    While that claim is also incorrect, did you not stop to notice that you
    have to change the end of the sentence to "on this subject" from your
    original claim - still quoted above - where it ended with "about why it's
    not his fault"?

    I'm not sure why you think you can get away with these misdirections and

    Your claim was that I will do X. I didn't do X. And the thread was well on
    its way to determine that I had no intention to do X. Yet you made the
    Since I have done no such thing, the above claim is also a lie - i.e. it is
    incorrect and it is my belief that you are fully aware of it being
    Also something I have not done. You can not quote me - for a million
    dollars - denying any such thing. For the record - I do not equate
    "multiple postings" with "deluge" as your clown dictionary surely does,
    but I have no denied making "multiple posts", as you well know - making
    this yet another lie. This is my 25:th post in this thread, by the way.
    Some "deluge" you have there.
    When was the last time I talked about the subject, Tony? And, what subject
    is it really, is it the news Savageduck posted, or is it the fact that I
    missed some features being announced?

    My second post in this thread was me saying that I had missed it.
    Savageduck seemed perplexed by this and asked some followup questions to
    just how I could have missed it, which I obviously politely answered. Other
    than that, I have not spoken about me missing the features, if that indeed
    is the "subject" you are in reference to. If the subject is the news
    itself, then I have written exactly one post in this thread about it.
    Sandman, Jan 23, 2014
  8. Savageduck

    Sandman Guest

    Why? Tony's and Peter's trolling has nothing to do with anything you've
    Sandman, Jan 23, 2014
  9. Savageduck

    Tony Cooper Guest

    These "mistakes" you refer to are figments of your imagination.
    In "on this subject", the subject is your claims that it isn't your
    fault. Anyone can figure that out.
    What's the difference between a "deluge" and an "onslaught"? You
    claimed to have responded with an "onslaught" of posts of
    substantiation some time ago. "Deluge" is used here much more
    accurately than "onslaught" was even considering that the word
    "onslaught" was used in a way that no one should use it.

    Twenty-five whining posts about being a victim of unsubstantiated
    charges is what I would call a "deluge". A "deluge" is "a large
    amount of things that come at the same time" (M-W), and the word fits.
    The "subject" is your follow-up to a simple, and excusable, oversight.
    The fact that you were unaware of the features until a recent thread
    would have been no big deal at all. That happens to most of us in
    some area. Instead of simply saying "I missed it", and letting it
    drop there, you made it a big deal by going on the offensive - and
    being offensive - in your usual style.

    All you had to do was to do nothing.
    Tony Cooper, Jan 23, 2014
  10. Savageduck

    Sandman Guest

    What claims of mine that *what* isn't my fault? Please quote me claiming
    that.. something... isn't my fault. I'm not even sure what I am supposed to
    be having denied was my own fault.
    Not much. Why did you change the subject? You just said that I had posted
    "multiple times" and that is a "deluge".
    Ah, but given the fact that there has in reality been zero whining posts
    about being a "victim" of unsubstantiatied charges, then there is no deluge
    and you were just lying, again.
    Not when used with that description, no.
    What the ****? Where did I go on the offensive, Tony? In my SECOND post in
    this thread did I say "I missed it"!

    You're delerious. And since I've quoted my posts many times and you have
    yet to quote thesde wild claims, it's not like you have any material to
    work with, just empty words - like your troll buddy before you.
    Sandman, Jan 24, 2014
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.