"Real WMV", 148.50 mhz sample-rate, 1920 X 1080 progressive scan image, "object data" bit-rate of 1b

Discussion in 'Amateur Video Production' started by Radium, Oct 30, 2006.

  1. Radium

    Radium Guest

    Bob Myers wrote in
    http://groups.google.com/group/sci.electronics.basics/msg/0d0bbebafddcd749?hl=en&
    :
    Why can't a WMV file of 148.50 mhz sample-rate, 1920 X 1080 progressive
    scan image-resolution with 1-bit-per-second exist? Can't the
    color-depth be compressed enough to decrease the bit-rate to
    1-bit-per-second? What stopping such from taking place?
     
    Radium, Oct 30, 2006
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Radium

    Ken Maltby Guest

    While it is good that you finally changed from "1-bit object data" to
    "'object data' bit-rate of 1bps", you have had several explanations as
    to why your "idea" of such a video file is not feasible. The evolution
    of your posts, is somewhat revealing, and they do show a very slow
    penetration of valid concepts. But you still refuse to either do the
    study/research yourself or except the observations of those with more
    experience in this area.

    After a certain age, whining the same refrain over and
    over again, gets you nowhere. (Unless you are someone's
    wife.)

    Luck;
    Ken
     
    Ken Maltby, Oct 30, 2006
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Radium

    Bob Myers Guest

    Like I said, go read up on some basic information theory, and
    start thinking about what "1 bit per second" could actually convey.
    Don't expect everyone here to do ALL your thinking for you...

    Bob M.
     
    Bob Myers, Oct 30, 2006
    #3
  4. Radium

    Ken Maltby Guest

    Simple logic should have ended this a long time ago.

    It would be at least 15 frames per bit, and not just any
    frames, but ones that are 1920 pixels x 1080 pixels in
    size.

    The WMV encoder shows 15 frames per second as the
    lowest setting. So 1/15th of his one bit is available for
    each frame. Even if his one bit were repeated 15 times,
    on playback, it would still be the same one bit of data
    for each of the 15 frames.

    But since no encoder (or any other program) can work
    with 1/15th of a bit and no player could render a frame
    of only one bit, this is just a romp through a delusional
    mind.

    Luck;
    Ken
     
    Ken Maltby, Oct 30, 2006
    #4
  5. Never heard of the millibit?

    OTOH, it might just have been the one "Switch the universe on"-bit that
    generates all our existence :p

    bis besser,
    Tobias
     
    Tobias Bergmann, Oct 30, 2006
    #5
  6. Radium

    Jukka Aho Guest

    I think you're going a bit too far.
     
    Jukka Aho, Oct 30, 2006
    #6

  7. That was a parsec wide pluger that said, DO NOT PUSH!


    --
    Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
    prove it.
    Member of DAV #85.

    Michael A. Terrell
    Central Florida
     
    Michael A. Terrell, Oct 30, 2006
    #7
  8. *Now* I understand!
     
    Gene E. Bloch, Oct 30, 2006
    #8

  9. Remember, don't think outside the box, because there is no box. ;-)


    --
    Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
    prove it.
    Member of DAV #85.

    Michael A. Terrell
    Central Florida
     
    Michael A. Terrell, Oct 31, 2006
    #9
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.