SI submissions?

Discussion in 'Photography' started by Tony Cooper, Dec 31, 2012.

  1. Tony Cooper

    Tony Cooper Guest

    I've lost track of when the SI "Street" submissions are due. I just
    sent mine in, but really don't know if I've sent them to the right
    address. I used the Rulz page link.

    What's going on?
     
    Tony Cooper, Dec 31, 2012
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Tony Cooper

    Robert Coe Guest

    : I've lost track of when the SI "Street" submissions are due. I just
    : sent mine in, but really don't know if I've sent them to the right
    : address. I used the Rulz page link.
    :
    : What's going on?

    The Maximum Leader's last pronouncement was that they're due on the 6th. Good
    thing too; I'm not ready yet.

    Bob
     
    Robert Coe, Dec 31, 2012
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Tony Cooper

    Savageduck Guest

    No kidding.
    I am going go on the hunt soon, or I am going to have to go to the archives.
     
    Savageduck, Dec 31, 2012
    #3
  4. Tony Cooper

    Savageduck Guest

    Jan 6.
     
    Savageduck, Dec 31, 2012
    #4
  5. Tony Cooper

    Eric Stevens Guest

    Archives are frowned on according to the RULZ.
     
    Eric Stevens, Dec 31, 2012
    #5
  6. Tony Cooper

    Peter Guest

    This time I complied with the leter and spirit. I went out to shoot
    expressly for the mandate. Though there is one shot from my archives.
    Mine are already in.
    Had I waited, I might not have had anything to submit. the mandate
    forced my to try something I don't usually do.
     
    Peter, Dec 31, 2012
    #6
  7. Tony Cooper

    Bowser Guest

    As other have already stated, the correct address is
    . The pix are due on the sixth, since I was out
    of touch for a while.

    I have three, but, well, I need to do a better job...
     
    Bowser, Jan 1, 2013
    #7
  8. Tony Cooper

    Bowser Guest

    "Maxium Leader." Nice. But it's not like I'm an IT director, or
    anything powerful like that.

    ;-)
     
    Bowser, Jan 1, 2013
    #8
  9. Tony Cooper

    Tony Cooper Guest

    I've submitted mine. If I come up with something better in the next
    week I'll offer them to anyone who hasn't had time or opportunity to
    do their own.
     
    Tony Cooper, Jan 1, 2013
    #9
  10. Tony Cooper

    Savageduck Guest

    I still like "Big Giant Head", that implies a certain element of
    chaotic thinking once distracted.
     
    Savageduck, Jan 2, 2013
    #10
  11. Tony Cooper

    Savageduck Guest

    Savageduck, Jan 5, 2013
    #11
  12. Tony Cooper

    Peter Guest

    Nice composition. A bit too contrasty in the background for my taste.
    the background highlights keep leading my eye from the main subject.
     
    Peter, Jan 5, 2013
    #12
  13. Tony Cooper

    Peter Guest

    Peter, Jan 5, 2013
    #13
  14. Tony Cooper

    Savageduck Guest

    I suspect that is a Tony Cooper typo. I just noticed that myself and
    checked his OP.
     
    Savageduck, Jan 5, 2013
    #14
  15. Tony Cooper

    Tony Cooper Guest

    What? You don't follow red.photo.digital? You don't know what you're
    missing. There are no arguments or flame wars on red.photo.digital.
    Floyd and nospam never post there. People treat other people with
    respect.

    Newbies never post without thoroughly researching their question
    first. When they do post, the provide all of the relevant information
    needed to answer their question. They always thank you.

    Post a link to a photo and you get a good critique complimenting what
    you did right and pointing out how the image could be improved. No
    one who never links to their own images is allowed to comment on other
    people's images.
     
    Tony Cooper, Jan 6, 2013
    #15
  16. Tony Cooper

    Robert Coe Guest

    : On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 15:39:16 -0800, Savageduck
    :
    : >>
    : >> BTW what is "red.photo.digital"?
    : >
    : >I suspect that is a Tony Cooper typo. I just noticed that myself and
    : >checked his OP.
    :
    : What? You don't follow red.photo.digital? You don't know what you're
    : missing. There are no arguments or flame wars on red.photo.digital.
    : Floyd and nospam never post there. People treat other people with
    : respect.
    :
    : Newbies never post without thoroughly researching their question
    : first. When they do post, the provide all of the relevant information
    : needed to answer their question. They always thank you.
    :
    : Post a link to a photo and you get a good critique complimenting what
    : you did right and pointing out how the image could be improved. No
    : one who never links to their own images is allowed to comment on other
    : people's images.

    But the discussion is confined exclusively to IR, is it not?

    Bob
     
    Robert Coe, Jan 6, 2013
    #16
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.