Sigma SD9 Photos Reviewed

Discussion in 'Digital Cameras' started by Frank Weston, Dec 27, 2003.

  1. SNIP
    This is USENET. Threads allow to follow the discussion without the need to
    repeat text, a concept clearly alien to you.

    Here it is again, face the pain, he signed it... Where is the signature?

    http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1000&message=6554872
    http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1000&message=6551081
    http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1000&message=6551352
    Where is his answer?

    Bart
     
    Bart van der Wolf, Jan 17, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  2. Frank Weston

    Ray Fischer Guest

    Aliasing artifacts are not cause by lenses, moron. They're caused by
    the sensor.
    You're blind, aren't you?
     
    Ray Fischer, Jan 17, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  3. Frank Weston

    KenP Guest

  4. Frank Weston

    KenP Guest

    Oops--wrong link. Sorry 'bout that...
     
    KenP, Jan 17, 2004
  5. CA is not a sensor artifact. I know many insist CA is exclusively a sensor
    atribute, because it is blurred out invisably using the same lens in a Canon
    mount in front of a blurry Canon sensor during controlled tests, but that is
    simply irrational rationalization.

    CA is a lens attribute, and the fact that only Foveon can see 1 pixel wide
    CA using the same lens is perhaps its greatest vindication.
     
    George Preddy, Jan 18, 2004
  6. I'll let you off the hook after claiming he didn't sign it when he did. Now
    you know.
     
    George Preddy, Jan 18, 2004
  7. Claiming that everyone who teaches you something is imaginary is simply
    weird, who do you think signed his name on those posts?
     
    George Preddy, Jan 18, 2004
  8. Frank Weston

    Crownfield Guest

    i call it sharpening halo, or shitty image.
     
    Crownfield, Jan 18, 2004
  9. Yes, really.
     
    George Preddy, Jan 18, 2004
  10. That's because you don't understand X3FL.
     
    George Preddy, Jan 18, 2004
  11. Frank Weston

    imbsysop Guest

    LOL if that's the effect of X3FL then dump it asap !!
     
    imbsysop, Jan 18, 2004
  12. What effect are you talking about? You are definitely confused. I'll be
    happy to explain how it works if you'd like.
     
    George Preddy, Jan 18, 2004
  13. Frank Weston

    imbsysop Guest

    no thanks .. if I feel a need for chaos I prefer to create my own :)
     
    imbsysop, Jan 18, 2004
  14. Frank Weston

    Crownfield Guest

    one of us certainly has an understanding lack.
    math challenges too.

    sharpening halo, or shitty image.
     
    Crownfield, Jan 19, 2004
  15. Hi Betty.

     
    George Preddy, Jan 19, 2004
  16. Ok, then refrain from comment until someone qualitfied educates you about
    X3FL.
     
    George Preddy, Jan 19, 2004
  17. There are no sharpening halos there, but X3FL is confusing you deeply.
     
    George Preddy, Jan 19, 2004
  18. Frank Weston

    Crownfield Guest

    obvioously there are.
    not even when you try very hard.
     
    Crownfield, Jan 19, 2004
  19. Frank Weston

    imbsysop Guest

    if you are talking about the sort of education you are showing here
    then please give my portion to the cat ... if it wants it ...
     
    imbsysop, Jan 19, 2004
  20. None. It is X3FL you are noticing. You should try advanced photography
    sometime, you'd be amzed how far technology has come.
     
    George Preddy, Jan 19, 2004
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.