Sigma SD9 Photos Reviewed

Discussion in 'Digital Cameras' started by Frank Weston, Dec 27, 2003.

  1. I'm under no illusion you want to be educated about advanced photography
    tools.
     
    George Preddy, Jan 19, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  2. Frank Weston

    imbsysop Guest

    ROTFL .. pump #6 is also spitting up mud .. from what I gather in this
    forum is that your knowledge of advanced photography is just an
    illusion ... so you have nothing to offer except trolling .
     
    imbsysop, Jan 19, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  3. Is it really? Well it ruins your images then (even more), why do you insist
    on using it?

    I'm amazed at how you can present poor images as fantastic without a hint of
    irony!
     
    Manfred von Richthofen, Jan 19, 2004

  4. Change the record George.
     
    Manfred von Richthofen, Jan 19, 2004
  5. If Canon 1Ds pounding dynamic range is a problem. Sigma has 2-3 more stops
    DR than Canon since X3FL. At least 2 more stops than Nikon.
     
    George Preddy, Jan 19, 2004
  6. I'm amazed that you've conceded that Canon images aren't worth linking.
    They're not, you're right.

    This "debate" (to categorize your childish rants sans images kindly) ended
    when you admitted Bayer DSLR images are not worth looking at.

    http://www.pbase.com/image/24888240/original.jpg
     
    George Preddy, Jan 19, 2004
  7. Frank Weston

    Crownfield Guest

    so x3fl new advanced technology
    means the pictures have elements
    that the original did not?

    sort of mystical photography?

    does it always show as sharpening halos,
    or are there there mystical benefits.

    these halos might have religious value.
     
    Crownfield, Jan 19, 2004
  8. Frank Weston

    Mike Engles Guest


    Hello
    Viewed at 100% the sky I very blotchy.

    Mike Engles
     
    Mike Engles, Jan 19, 2004
  9. Generating 8 to 10 times extra noise doesn't
    really help Sigma images, you know...
     
    Michael Quack, Jan 19, 2004

  10. X3FL does not do anything to help the dynamic range - that is an attribute
    of the sensor. Shit for brains.
     
    Manfred von Richthofen, Jan 20, 2004
  11. Well done George, you can invent your own truth. I never said Canon images
    aren't worth linking to.
    Well done George, you can invent your own truth. I never said Bayer DSLR
    image are not worht looking at.

    Your the childish one. Why do you feel the need to make up what people have
    said?
    Oh a photograph. Guess what, I can't see it all it won't fit on my monitor.
    Obviously posted by an idiot with a penis envy problem.
     
    Manfred von Richthofen, Jan 20, 2004
  12. That is all it does.
     
    George Preddy, Jan 21, 2004
  13. Frank Weston

    Ray Fischer Guest

    Crappy images are crappy images regardless of whether they come from
    the camera, the software you're required to use with the camera, or
    both.
     
    Ray Fischer, Jan 24, 2004
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.