Sony A700 - Good and not so good points

Discussion in 'Sony' started by Alan Browne, Sep 7, 2007.

  1. Alan Browne

    Alan Browne Guest

    A very quick review based on what is found on the dpreview site.

    A mix of very good and ordinary. I'll wait for the A900 (or A9, or
    whatever they call the "real" camera).

    At least here the shutter speed is decent and the x-sync is in "pro"
    territory again. Decent ISO (and hopefully usable).

    Claim of 4 stops of shake reduction.

    CMOS ... and a new "A/D on every row" design... could be a low noise boon.

    Looks like they've gone back to an IR focus assist instead of the
    idiotic use of the flash in a soft strobe mode.

    Metal chassis.

    Front and rear control dial for A and S.

    No sign of the stupid locks on the mode dial.

    WHERE THE HELL ARE THE EXP COMP DIALS? If this has been menu
    buried then this camera is definitely not for me.

    DOF preview button is awkwardly positioned (like on the 7D).

    I'm afraid they may have dumbed down the WB. I hope not.

    No live preview.

    No indication to date of shutter lag. It's about 100 - 150 ms on the 7D
    .... hope they gat back to the 50ms range soon...

    Interesting that they show a Minolta 50 f/1.4 A-mount on the dpreview site:

    I'll sit this one out... but then I already said I would. Let's see the
    "9" class machine.

    Alan Browne, Sep 7, 2007
    1. Advertisements

  2. Alan Browne

    ASAAR Guest

    Really? Doesn't Fuji have several other P&S cameras that are
    superior to the S8000fd? I'd think that even those wouldn't be a
    match for Sony's A700, assuming that price wasn't a consideration.
    ASAAR, Sep 8, 2007
    1. Advertisements

  3. Alan Browne

    Alan Browne Guest

    It will come down.

    The A900 (or "9" or whatever) will follow... that hopefully will be a
    kickbut spec... and more than $1400 I would guess.
    The AD on each row is a great idea that helps get this machine to ISO
    6400... technology does make things better.

    What sucks is the lack of exp comp dials for both available and flash
    light... there is an exp-comp button on the right... so they missed an
    opportunity to have the front dial control exp-comp and the rear dial
    control flash exp comp. Better yet, proper dials dedicated to each as
    on the Maxxum 9, 7, 7D and others. Minolta understood this very well.

    I'm really afraid Sony don't get it.
    Alan Browne, Sep 8, 2007
  4. Alan Browne

    ASAAR Guest

    With those newly added qualifiers, I guess that some of the DSLR's
    potential wouldn't often be utilized. I still don't see how a small
    (very) sensor P&S can be compared with a DSLR though. I know of
    only one person that got a DSLR just to shoot limited quality shots.

    If I upgrade my small sensor S5100 (1/2.5"), it would be to a Fuji
    that has a larger sensor, such as that used in the F31 and S6000fd.
    Other brands that have wide range zooms and IS have been available
    for quite some time, so the S8000fd isn't really offering anything
    new. In my opinion, it's just Fuji's way of taking two steps
    forward and one step back. I'd have been more impressed with the
    S8000fd if the ultra-wide zoom range was sacrificed somewhat in
    favor of a larger sensor. That's the camera that Fuji should have
    introduced a year or two ago.
    ASAAR, Sep 8, 2007
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.