The death of the Bayer filter? Maybe not.

Discussion in 'Digital Cameras' started by Rich, Apr 4, 2012.

  1. Rich

    TheRealSteve Guest

    You need to look up what non-sequitur means. You're not using it
    correctly.
    I have no idea nor do I care what the best Foveon FF camera is.
    First you have to demonstrate that you grasp standard English before
    you can judge whenter someone else does. So far, you haven't.
     
    TheRealSteve, May 25, 2012
    1. Advertisements

  2. [/QUOTE]
    I am using it correctly.

    more handwaving, and proof you're not comptent to discuss Foveon.

    Steve, you judging my understanding of English is a blind man
    waxing on about the colours of nature he's standing in front of.

    -Wolfgang
     
    Wolfgang Weisselberg, May 25, 2012
    1. Advertisements

  3. Rich

    TheRealSteve Guest

    See, there's a non-sequitur. Just because someone doesn't know or care
    what the best Foveon FF camera is has absolutely no bearinig on their
    competency to discuss the technology and resolution of the Foveon
    sensor. So without even knowing what the term non-sequitur means, you
    just gave the perfect example of one. Congrats!
     
    TheRealSteve, May 27, 2012
  4. [/QUOTE]
    And the Pope is the right person to discuss the finer points of
    practical sexuality between 2 or more women and which sex toys
    work for them.
    Nope, you really need to look up the term.

    -Wolfgang
     
    Wolfgang Weisselberg, May 27, 2012
  5. Rich

    TheRealSteve Guest

    Yet another non-sequitur. You're really getting good at this.
    Lol. You mean you're not even trying to reply with non-sequiturs and
    you actually think you are making sense? That's sad.
     
    TheRealSteve, May 29, 2012
  6. In fact, that isn't a non sequitur. It would be one if I claimed
    that therefore you're the Pope. You're not even that.

    Sad is that you don't have any of
    - knowledge
    - arguments
    - charm
    - intelligence
    nor are you
    - fun to read
    - useful as a study object of dementia
    - useful as a study object of obstinacy of old age
    - asking intelligent questions

    You're just obnoxious, hiding behind your stupid pseudonym,
    hoping nobody knows who you are.

    You're not worth reading. I tried really hard (I am quite
    stubborn, I know), but I won't read you for the next half
    year. Have fun, grow up.

    -Wolfgang
     
    Wolfgang Weisselberg, May 29, 2012
  7. Rich

    TheRealSteve Guest

    Ok, so you really don't know what a non-seqitur is. I'll give you a
    hint... It doesn't follow that "the Pope is the right person to
    discuss the finer points of practical sexuality between 2 or more
    women and which sex toys work for them" from "someone who doesn't know
    or care what the best Foveon FF camera is has absolutely no bearing on
    their competency to discuss the technology and resolution of the
    Foveon sensor. Plenty of other analogies apply perfectly well. The
    Pope one doesn't. Here's one that does: An aeronautical engineer can
    be highly skilled and competent to discuss the finer points of fluid
    flow over a surface even if he doesn't have an opinion or know or care
    what the "best" airliner in the world is.
    Coming from you, those are all compliments. Sad is that that's the
    best argument you can come up with. All the ones you actually tried to
    proffer just don't make sense. Like the Pope one above.
    <sarcasm>A dignified exit if I ever saw one.</sarcasm>
     
    TheRealSteve, Jun 1, 2012
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.