theory question

Discussion in 'Photography' started by Diluted, Oct 11, 2004.

  1. Diluted

    Diluted Guest

    If I was to shoot some film without a polariser, would I be able to use one
    on the enlarger to make the colours richer when printing?
    Obviously it wouldnt effect things like reflections, but would it alter the
    colours or what would happen?

    if it wouldnt work, why not, and what would happen?

    just wondering :)

    thanks in advance.
     
    Diluted, Oct 11, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Diluted

    andre Guest

    So far for theory. In reality the film will saturate and you will have
    lost detail that you can not bring back during post processing of any kind.

    Andre
     
    andre, Oct 11, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. No, it won't work at all.

    A polarizer takes advantage of the fact that light waves
    reflected off a flat/shiny surface has a particular orientation
    (when I say orientation, think of the waves in the surface of
    the sea or a swimming pool -- they oscillate up and down, as
    opposed to sideways; that's what I mean with the "orientation";
    the technical term is, not surprisingly, polarization).

    So, the polarizer filter only lets through waves that have a
    particular polarization -- you turn it to adjust which sense
    you want to block (i.e., to align the filter with the surfaces
    that are sending unwanted glare). But once those waves reach
    the film chemicals or the sensor cells (depending on the type
    of camera), the amount of light is "measured and recorded".
    The fact that such light had a particular polarization is not
    "recorded", and thus the information is lost.

    When you're processing the negatives or digital image, there
    are no reflections to be eliminated -- there is light with a
    pattern equal to the one you see off a glaring surface, but
    it is no longer a glaring surface.

    So, no, the trick won't work. Same thing should be true for
    most filters -- they normally take advantage of features that
    are present in the actual light waves you're catching; after
    that light was caught and recorded, a lot of information is
    "lost" (it is discarded at some point in the process of
    "recording" that light pattern), and often that information
    is the one that the filters take advantage of.

    HTH,

    Carlos
    --
     
    Carlos Moreno, Oct 11, 2004
    #3
  4. Diluted

    Diluted Guest

    cheers, just wondering.
    I havent exposed any film without polarising, but i thought it best to ask
    before trying it and hoping it worked :p

    thanks
     
    Diluted, Oct 11, 2004
    #4
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.