Updated Stereoscopic Web Site [Twin Camera Setup]

Discussion in 'Photoshop' started by Josh Hed, May 10, 2005.

  1. Josh Hed

    Josh Hed Guest


    In a desperate attempt to capture some "live" subjects I bought a
    couple of single-use cameras and affixed them to a straight edge. The
    closest I could get the lenses was 4.5 inches apart so I was forced to
    roughly an 11 foot distance from my subject but at least I was able to
    take some "live" shots.

    I added the new photos to the web page. To view the "newest" pictures,
    make sure you choose the "Sort by Date" radio button.

    If you could take a look at the web page and let me know what you think
    it would be greatly appreciated. Please feel free to give me any
    pointers as I am always eager to learn.


    Josh Hed

    Josh Hed, May 10, 2005
    1. Advertisements

  2. Josh Hed

    KatWoman Guest

    KatWoman, May 11, 2005
    1. Advertisements

  3. Josh Hed

    Mike Russell Guest

    In a desperate attempt to capture some "live" subjects I bought a
    How should be view your images? Some of the images are too large for me to
    fuse by eye alone. I consider myself an athlete, at least when it comes to
    registering stereo images.

    I was able to fuse the bed image because the images are not quite as far
    apart. You're correct that the inter-camera eye distance is a little too
    large. A pair of old coolpix 990's will get you to within a nominal eye
    separation distance or less for macro subjects such as your deer model. The
    bed image has a blue cast and could use some improvement in contrast and
    Mike Russell, May 26, 2005
  4. Josh Hed

    Mike Russell Guest

    [re stereo images at] A couple more comments. My previous comments were based only on the first
    page of your album. Some of your full images are swapped, requiring a
    wall-eyed approach to fusing them - these I find impossible.

    The cross-eyed images are possible to view, and yes, the inter-occular
    distance is too large, giving an unconfortable exaggerated 3D effect and
    making some subjects look smaller than reality - always a problem with 3D in
    any case.
    Mike Russell, May 26, 2005
  5. Time to revive the stereopticon? I'd love to do 3D panoramas...
    Robert Feinman, May 27, 2005
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.