Waterfall Photography

Discussion in 'Photography' started by Forest Wanderer, Oct 20, 2006.

  1. Forest Wanderer, Oct 20, 2006
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Forest Wanderer

    UC Guest

    Of course. It was inevitable. Worthless crap. Already, 75 billion
    photographs of waterfalls, none of which is in the least interesting,
    and you morons want to make more? You're worthless shitheads! Go shove
    your wet tripods up your ass!
     
    UC, Oct 20, 2006
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Forest Wanderer

    Newsgroups Guest

    I thought this was a friendly group. There are thousands of pictures of just
    about everything. Thanks for the information about the gruop Forest.
     
    Newsgroups, Oct 20, 2006
    #3
  4. Forest Wanderer

    UC Guest

    It is. But there is no excuse for taking photos of waterfalls. Or time
    exposures of water running over rocks. It's sickening to see people who
    have NO imagination whatsoever. These photos are BORING. No-one looks
    at waterfall photos except his own. They're pointless and trite.
     
    UC, Oct 20, 2006
    #4
  5. Forest Wanderer

    Newsgroups Guest

    I may not disagree with you, and if I do, or I don't it doesn't matter. I do
    disagree with the need to be so profanely critical. What do you think are
    better subjects other than waterfalls? Personally, I like any pictures that
    reflect nature in motion.
    Dan and Anna
     
    Newsgroups, Oct 20, 2006
    #5
  6. Forest Wanderer

    UC Guest

    Female breasts, for one!

    Cute kids, for another:

    http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1855832&forward=main
    Yeah, what do you know? They're boring. Go to
    http://www.photosig.com/go/main;jsessionid=aXb0KVWZ9jehbc8QM5

    and see how many THOUSANDS of stupid waterfall photos there are. Not
    even 1 in 10,000 is even remotely interesing. It's the same damn thing,
    one after another:

    http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1855218&forward=browse
    http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1855194&forward=browse
    http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1855163&forward=browse
    http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1855115&forward=browse
    http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1854554&forward=browse
    http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1854119&forward=browse
    http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1853938&forward=browse
    http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1853801&forward=browse
    http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1853269&forward=browse

    THEY'RE NOT INTERESTING!

    THEY'RE BORING AND TRITE!

    THEY REQUIRE NO SKILL!

    AND THERE ARE BILLIONS OF THEM!

    http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/browsecategories?typeId=1

    http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/browse?id=21
     
    UC, Oct 20, 2006
    #6
  7. Forest Wanderer

    Dan and Anna Guest

    Breasts are ok, but you probably know that there are already a lot of breast
    pictures out there.
     
    Dan and Anna, Oct 20, 2006
    #7
  8. Granted, there's only so much you can do with waterfalls. But you would
    probably do well to get a decent, well-exposed photograph of anything.
     
    Randall Ainsworth, Oct 21, 2006
    #8
  9. Forest Wanderer

    UC Guest

    Yes, I can get a well-exposed, well-composed photograph of anything.
     
    UC, Oct 21, 2006
    #9
  10. I doubt it. You're far worse than I am for jumping on idiots here in
    the newsgroups.
     
    Randall Ainsworth, Oct 21, 2006
    #10
  11. Forest Wanderer

    UC Guest

    What evidence have you?
     
    UC, Oct 21, 2006
    #11
  12. I read your posts.
     
    Randall Ainsworth, Oct 21, 2006
    #12
  13. Forest Wanderer

    UC Guest

    Ha ha ha ha
     
    UC, Oct 21, 2006
    #13
  14. Forest Wanderer

    dj_nme Guest


    I read your posts.[/QUOTE]

    Rather than blowing a fuse and wasting endless hours replying to UC,
    please just plonk him.
    If you're using Thunderbird: right-click on his "from" name (top right
    hand corner of the viewing window), select "create filter from message"
    and then select "delete message" as your action and then click "ok".
    Next time you look at alt.photography, UC will have 'magically' disappeared.
    Happy trails...
     
    dj_nme, Oct 22, 2006
    #14
  15. Forest Wanderer

    UC Guest

    Yes, but you will still be stuck with your stupidity....
     
    UC, Oct 22, 2006
    #15
  16. I don't believe in using e-mail programs for doing newsgroups. UC is a
    know jerk. I've got a pretty thick skin, so there's nothing he can say
    to hurt my feelings.
     
    Randall Ainsworth, Oct 22, 2006
    #16
  17. Forest Wanderer

    UC Guest

    What makes you think I am trying to hurt your feelings? I couldn't care
    less about your feelings.
     
    UC, Oct 22, 2006
    #17
  18. It's obvious that you don't care about anybody's feelings.
     
    Randall Ainsworth, Oct 22, 2006
    #18
  19. Forest Wanderer

    UC Guest

    Damn right.
     
    UC, Oct 22, 2006
    #19
  20. Forest Wanderer

    Rob Guest

    Thanks for the advice dj_nme, UC will be gone forever.
    Most likely he's not even a true photographer anyway, because a true
    photographer appreciates all photography. Regardless if it's waterfalls or
    whatever. UC is just blowing smoke out his a$$.
     
    Rob, Oct 23, 2006
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.