Which lens?

Discussion in 'UK Photography' started by Woody, Mar 17, 2013.

  1. Woody

    Woody Guest

    I am looking to equip myself with a wide angle zoom to compliment
    the 18-70 and 18-200 that I already have. There are three sizes
    widely available:-
    10-20mm by Sigma
    12-24mm by Tokina and Nikon
    10-24mm by Tamron

    My 18-200 is Tamron which tends to be a bit soft unless well
    stopped down, but I have always liked the brand. However reviews
    that I have read suggest that the 10-24 tends to be softer than
    most.
    I too like Tokina: I have a 24-70 on one of my film cameras and
    have always found it to be a good optic. They do have a tendency
    to be a bit pricey though.
    I cannot afford the Nikon.
    I have a Sigma 28-200 for film and have never found it to be
    particularly good, so I am a little sceptical about the 10-20.

    My problem: will I see much difference at the wide end between
    10mm and 12mm? Distortion tends to be most prevalent at the ends
    and it bothers me that if I go for the 10-20 I will have
    distortion at the long end of that lens and on the wide end of my
    18-70 Nikon. It worries me that I may have a small band of focal
    length that I cannot use - in that respect the 24 would at least
    give me some possibilities. Sod's Law says that the 18-20 band is
    just where I might need to be sometime!

    Has anyone on here used any of these lenses and thus experience
    of them and can give me advice? I want the lens for the
    occasional panorama and for architecture, particularly
    ecclesiastical.

    I mainly use a Nikon D80 but also have a D70s which I tend to use
    as a standby with longer lenses.

    TIA


    --
    Woody

    harrogate three at ntlworld dot com
     
    Woody, Mar 17, 2013
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Woody

    Paul Giverin Guest

    In message <ki529b$dr3$>, Woody <>
    writes
    >I am looking to equip myself with a wide angle zoom to compliment
    >the 18-70 and 18-200 that I already have. There are three sizes
    >widely available:-
    >10-20mm by Sigma
    >12-24mm by Tokina and Nikon
    >10-24mm by Tamron
    >

    Have you considered the Tokina 11-16mm?

    I know its a very short range, almost a prime but I think its quite well
    regarded.

    I think the Sigma 10-20mm is a nice lens if you get a good copy. I've
    heard of a few quality issues with Sigma but on the plus side, there is
    no problem in getting a dodgy one exchanged and they do come with a 3
    year warranty as standard.

    I'm a Canon man and I've got the Canon 10-22mm but I have to admit I've
    not used it in a while. I sometimes wonder if I should sell it but I
    bought it cheap (grey tax free import) and it would cost me a lot if
    subsequently I had to buy one again.

    --
    Paul Giverin

    My Photos:- www.giverin.co.uk
     
    Paul Giverin, Mar 17, 2013
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Woody

    Savageduck Guest

    On 2013-03-17 14:29:28 -0700, Paul Giverin <> said:

    > In message <ki529b$dr3$>, Woody <> writes
    >> I am looking to equip myself with a wide angle zoom to compliment
    >> the 18-70 and 18-200 that I already have. There are three sizes
    >> widely available:-
    >> 10-20mm by Sigma
    >> 12-24mm by Tokina and Nikon
    >> 10-24mm by Tamron
    >>

    > Have you considered the Tokina 11-16mm?
    >
    > I know its a very short range, almost a prime but I think its quite
    > well regarded.


    Agreed.
    The Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 for the Nikon or Canon APS-C sensor is tough
    to beat. I use mine on a D300s.
    Here are a few of my shots using the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 on my D300S.
    < http://db.tt/H6jqvaRK >
    < http://db.tt/MOXTZaDt >
    < http://db.tt/3sN2nr2E >
    < http://db.tt/RYAgaZd2 >


    >
    > I think the Sigma 10-20mm is a nice lens if you get a good copy. I've
    > heard of a few quality issues with Sigma but on the plus side, there is
    > no problem in getting a dodgy one exchanged and they do come with a 3
    > year warranty as standard.
    >
    > I'm a Canon man and I've got the Canon 10-22mm but I have to admit I've
    > not used it in a while. I sometimes wonder if I should sell it but I
    > bought it cheap (grey tax free import) and it would cost me a lot if
    > subsequently I had to buy one again.



    --
    Regards,

    Savageduck
     
    Savageduck, Mar 18, 2013
    #3
  4. Woody

    Woody Guest

    "Savageduck" <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in message
    news:201303172302154530-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
    > On 2013-03-17 14:29:28 -0700, Paul Giverin <>
    > said:
    >
    >> In message <ki529b$dr3$>, Woody
    >> <> writes
    >>> I am looking to equip myself with a wide angle zoom to
    >>> compliment
    >>> the 18-70 and 18-200 that I already have. There are three
    >>> sizes
    >>> widely available:-
    >>> 10-20mm by Sigma
    >>> 12-24mm by Tokina and Nikon
    >>> 10-24mm by Tamron
    >>>

    >> Have you considered the Tokina 11-16mm?
    >>
    >> I know its a very short range, almost a prime but I think its
    >> quite well regarded.

    >
    > Agreed.
    > The Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 for the Nikon or Canon APS-C sensor is
    > tough to beat. I use mine on a D300s.
    > Here are a few of my shots using the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 on my
    > D300S.
    > < http://db.tt/H6jqvaRK >
    > < http://db.tt/MOXTZaDt >
    > < http://db.tt/3sN2nr2E >
    > < http://db.tt/RYAgaZd2 >
    >
    >
    >>
    >> I think the Sigma 10-20mm is a nice lens if you get a good
    >> copy. I've heard of a few quality issues with Sigma but on the
    >> plus side, there is no problem in getting a dodgy one
    >> exchanged and they do come with a 3 year warranty as standard.
    >>
    >> I'm a Canon man and I've got the Canon 10-22mm but I have to
    >> admit I've not used it in a while. I sometimes wonder if I
    >> should sell it but I bought it cheap (grey tax free import)
    >> and it would cost me a lot if subsequently I had to buy one
    >> again.

    >
    >
    > --



    Thanks both.

    Methinks I should save my pennies and get a D300 - or even a
    D600. I never get pictures and bright and sharp as that!!!!


    --
    Woody

    harrogate three at ntlworld dot com
     
    Woody, Mar 18, 2013
    #4
  5. Woody

    spacecadet Guest

    Sigma quality and customer service is dreadful. I had the focusing rack
    break up on my short zoom after less than 3 years and a 55-200 go out of
    alignment after less than a year, at which point they refused to replace
    it and sent it to Japan for some improvement, but not much.
     
    spacecadet, Mar 18, 2013
    #5
  6. Woody

    Paul Giverin Guest

    In message <ki6f3e$olc$>, Woody <>
    writes
    >
    >Methinks I should save my pennies and get a D300 - or even a
    >D600. I never get pictures and bright and sharp as that!!!!
    >
    >

    They are nice pictures but the lighting is good which helps the
    brightness. Sharpness is more a function of your lens and post
    processing rather than your sensor. That's not to say you shouldn't
    treat yourself with a nice D600 ;)

    --
    Paul Giverin

    My Photos:- www.giverin.co.uk
     
    Paul Giverin, Mar 18, 2013
    #6
  7. Woody

    kimbaum

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2017
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    I find Tamron lenses more affordable but still as reliable as the others.
     
    kimbaum, Nov 16, 2017
    #7
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.